2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Colour remote sensing of the impact of artificial light at night (II): Calibration of DSLR-based images from the International Space Station

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We believe that the bands of future sensors must contain at least three bands in the visible range, as well as a near-infrared band (IR). With three bands, the ISS and UAV data can overcome the limitations of traditional mono-spectral VIIRS/DNB data [46][47][48]. Whether for urban lighting or light pollution, a single wide waveband is no longer able to meet our requirements.…”
Section: Spectral Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We believe that the bands of future sensors must contain at least three bands in the visible range, as well as a near-infrared band (IR). With three bands, the ISS and UAV data can overcome the limitations of traditional mono-spectral VIIRS/DNB data [46][47][48]. Whether for urban lighting or light pollution, a single wide waveband is no longer able to meet our requirements.…”
Section: Spectral Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Three different ISS image parts in the study areas were first selected to obtain the optimal thresholding values of brightness for separating bright urban areas and lowlight suburban areas (Figure 3). We focused on only low-light suburban areas to avoid duplicating efforts, given that numerous studies have shown that ISS imagery is very useful to map lighting types and land surface within bright urban areas [45,47,48]. In the image of Calgary, the optimal thresholding values were found to be 35 for the red band, 30 for the yellow band, and 25 for the blue band, respectively.…”
Section: Retrieving the Low-light Suburban Areasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, challenges are posed by remote sensing approaches that are almost always only proxies for the ecological variable of interest. Night-time satellite data are limited in spatial, spectral and temporal resolution, but color imaging from the international space station ISS, airborne measurements, and particularly UAVs have the potential to fill the existing gaps in ALAN related biodiversity research (Bouroussis and Topalis, 2020;Levin et al, 2020;Sánchez de Miguel et al, 2021). A key component to improving the utility of these data would be research efforts that can translate what remotely sensed values could represent for conditions at ground level, where first steps have been taken but uncertainties remain high (Simons et al, 2020).…”
Section: Interdisciplinary Barriers To Measuring Nocturnal Lightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monochrome and RGB imagery of artificial light emissions with nearly worldwide coverage is presently provided by several on-orbit radiometers (Elvidge et al 2017(Elvidge et al , 2021Levin et al 2020;? ;Zheng et al 2018) as well as by the Crew Earth Observation program of the International Space Station (Sánchez de Miguel et al 2019Miguel et al , 2021Stefanov et al 2017). These inputs are expected to be enough for computing world hemispheric sky brightness maps with a level of accuracy comparable to that already attained by their zenith counterparts (Falchi et al 2016).…”
Section: Artificial Light Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%