1986
DOI: 10.1007/bf03402656
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Column flotation of Montana chromite ore

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of the different separation cells (MultiDimFlot vs. benchmark mechanical cell) showed that the benchmark cell yields generally higher recoveries, but also poorer grades than does the MultiDimFlot cell, regardless of the particle system used. This was more or less expected, since it is known that a deep froth reduces the entrainment of hydrophilic gangue material [32,44,46]. Especially, flotation tests with the C0 particle systems, i.e., ultrafine hydrophilic valuable and gangue, where recovery is supposed to occur via entrainment only, revealed significant differences in the performance of the two apparatuses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The comparison of the different separation cells (MultiDimFlot vs. benchmark mechanical cell) showed that the benchmark cell yields generally higher recoveries, but also poorer grades than does the MultiDimFlot cell, regardless of the particle system used. This was more or less expected, since it is known that a deep froth reduces the entrainment of hydrophilic gangue material [32,44,46]. Especially, flotation tests with the C0 particle systems, i.e., ultrafine hydrophilic valuable and gangue, where recovery is supposed to occur via entrainment only, revealed significant differences in the performance of the two apparatuses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 82%