1985
DOI: 10.1099/00207713-35-4-443
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comamonas Davis and Park 1962 gen. nov., nom. rev. emend., and Comamonas terrigena Hugh 1962 sp. nov., nom. rev.

Abstract: The historical and present taxonomic and nomenclatural status of the following taxa were examined: "Vibrio terngenus" Gunther 1894, "Vibrio percolans" Mudd and Warren 1923, "Vibrio alcaligenes" Lehmann and rev. An extensive phenotypic description of C . terrigena is given, and this species can be differentiated from P . acidovorans and P . testosteroni. "Achromobacter cystinovorum" NCIB 4854 is misnamed and was found to be very elosely related to P . acidoovorans. "V. alcaligenes" NCTC 9239 was found to be mis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
1
1

Year Published

1987
1987
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
77
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…avenae and Acidovorax avenae subsp. cattleyae had the same chemotaxonomic characteristics and could be distinguished clearly from the genus Pseudomonas sensu strict0 (P. jluorescens rRNA branch [ll]), Burkholderia species, Comamonas species, and Hydrogenophaga species on the basis of phenotypic characteristics (10,17,28,35,38,44), ubiquinone systems, DNA base compositions, DNA-DNA homology data, and rRNA-DNA hybridization data (9,11,52,53) (Table 9). Minimal characteristics for differentiating the genera Burkholderia, Acidovorax, Comamonas, Hydrogenophaga, and Pseudomonas are shown in Table 9.…”
Section: + + + --+ + -+ + -+ + --+ + -mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…avenae and Acidovorax avenae subsp. cattleyae had the same chemotaxonomic characteristics and could be distinguished clearly from the genus Pseudomonas sensu strict0 (P. jluorescens rRNA branch [ll]), Burkholderia species, Comamonas species, and Hydrogenophaga species on the basis of phenotypic characteristics (10,17,28,35,38,44), ubiquinone systems, DNA base compositions, DNA-DNA homology data, and rRNA-DNA hybridization data (9,11,52,53) (Table 9). Minimal characteristics for differentiating the genera Burkholderia, Acidovorax, Comamonas, Hydrogenophaga, and Pseudomonas are shown in Table 9.…”
Section: + + + --+ + -+ + -+ + --+ + -mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nearest phylogenetic relatives of the Comamonadaceae are [Pseudomonas] saccharophila, Members of the Comamonadaceae, originally the acidovorans rRNA complex (De Vos et al, 1985; Rubrivivax gelatinosus, -Leptothrix and Sphaeiotilus (Willems et al, 1991a). Willems et al, 1987Willems et al, , 1989Willems et al, , 1990, belong to rRNA superfamily I11 (De Ley 1978) or the / 3 subclass of the Proteobacteria (Stackebrandt et al, 1988).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The present paper is an extension of our previous phylogenetic studies on Pseudomonas (14,15,17) and deals with the taxonomic locations of saprophytic species and a few clinical named Pseudomonas species from addenda I, 111, and IV in Bergey 's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, 8th ed. (20), or section V in Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (41) or both in our rRNA framework (Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%