Comanagement at the Fringes: Examining Stakeholder Perspectives at Macassar Dunes, Cape Town, South Africa--at the Intersection of High Biodiversity, Urban Poverty, and Inequality

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Theoretically, co-management provides a fruitful way to engage local residents in efforts to conserve and manage particular spaces of ecological value. However, natural resource management, and biodiversity conservation in particular, are faced with novel sets of complexities in the rapidly urbanizing areas of Cape Town, South Africa, and in the nexus between an apartheid past, informal settlements, remnant biodiversity patches, and urban poverty. Departing from such a dynamic social and ecological context, this article first provides an historical account of the decade-long comanagement process at Macassar Dunes, and then considers, through stakeholder perceptions, what are the successes and failures of the contested process. We find that comanagement at Macassar Dunes faces serious legitimacy, trust, and commitment issues, but also that stakeholders find common ground on education and awareness-raising activities. In conclusion we argue that the knowledge generated from case studies like this is useful in challenging and rethinking natural resource management theory generally, but specifically it is useful for the growing cities of the Global South. More case studies and a deeper engagement are needed with geographical theories on the "urban fringe" as "possibility space", to help build a firm empirical base for theorizing comanagement "at the fringes", i.e., at the intersection of poverty, socioeconomic inequality, and high biodiversity and ecological values.

Nature-based solutions to climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban areas: perspectives on indicators, knowledge gaps, barriers, and opportunities for action

“…The partnering of different actors may reduce barriers or constraints for adopting NbS as well as for their implementation in cities (Graham andErnstson 2012, Frantzeskaki et al 2014). Specifically, collaborative arrangements enable the distributed responsibilities that further foster a shift from risk aversion to sharing the risk of new solutions like NbS (Visseren-Hamakers et al 2012).…”

Urban Ecological and Social-Ecological Research in the City of Cape Town: Insights Emerging from an Urban Ecology CityLab

“…Natural resource management and conservation in the City are generally well supported by good policy and planning instruments, but the knowing-doing gap is a persistent problem . Opportunities exist for the effective comanagement or resources with better engagement with greater society, but these arrangements while potentially effective, require ongoing and critical review (Graham and Ernstson 2012). There is specificity around species response, or at least functional type, in the urban that point to a need for considerable additional research echoing similar calls in the international literature , Pauw and Louw 2012, Hoffman and O'Riain 2012.…”

Inequality, Bi-Polarization and Mobility of Urban Infrastructure Investment in China’s Urban System

“…The Relationship between Inequality, Bi-Polarization, Equity, and Urban Sustainability Equity has been a fundamental issue for human society and a major concern of governments worldwide [63]. Indeed, equity is an important factor to promote sustainable development, which can enhance the resilience of the economy [64], promote social harmony and stability [65], as well as protect environment [66] and biodiversity [67]. Furthermore, residents living in more equitable regions have better health and a longer life expectancy [68,69].…”