2005
DOI: 10.30861/9781841718118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comb-Making in Medieval Novgorod (950-1450): An industry in transition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…biogeographical means: through the identification of antler products to species level. A number of authors (Lie, 1993;Stephan, 1994;Ballin Smith, 1995;Weber, 1995;Smirnova, 2002;Ashby, 2009Ashby, , 2013b have attempted to differentiate 'local' species from imported material using macroscopic zoological methods, but these approaches have had limited success for highly worked or fragmentary material (Ulbricht, 1978: 20-21;Ambrosiani, 1981: 104-09;Ilkjaer & von Carnap-Bornheim, 1993: 319;Rau, 2010: 422). Bioarchaeology offers the potential to provide species identifications at the molecular level.…”
Section: Combmakers As Urban Craftspeoplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…biogeographical means: through the identification of antler products to species level. A number of authors (Lie, 1993;Stephan, 1994;Ballin Smith, 1995;Weber, 1995;Smirnova, 2002;Ashby, 2009Ashby, , 2013b have attempted to differentiate 'local' species from imported material using macroscopic zoological methods, but these approaches have had limited success for highly worked or fragmentary material (Ulbricht, 1978: 20-21;Ambrosiani, 1981: 104-09;Ilkjaer & von Carnap-Bornheim, 1993: 319;Rau, 2010: 422). Bioarchaeology offers the potential to provide species identifications at the molecular level.…”
Section: Combmakers As Urban Craftspeoplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This eastern source was documented as early as the late ninth century CE, when the Arctic Norwegian chieftain Ohthere visited the court of King Alfred of Wessex in England [ 22 , 23 ]. The continued importance of this source is implied by the great abundance of walrus ivory known from medieval Novgorod—an important trading town with an extensive network into Arctic Fennoscandia and Russia [ 24 , 25 ]—and by the hunting of the Arctic European walrus in the Svalbard Archipelago between the sixteenth and twentieth centuries [ 26 ]. Finally, walruses were also initially hunted in Iceland during its colonization in the late ninth and tenth centuries [ 7 , 9 , 27 ], but by the twelfth–thirteenth centuries, when the island's earliest laws and narrative texts were first recorded, Icelandic walruses were reduced to isolated visitors only [ 9 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Centres in Eastern Europe also provide evidence of mediaeval walrus trade. Novgorod, Russia, has produced one of the largest collections of carved mediaeval walrus ivory in Europe [ 9 , 10 ] and excavations in Kyiv, Ukraine, revealed nine walrus rostra—more than most northern European centres; only Bergen and Schleswig, with 15 examples each, have more [ 3 , 11 , 12 ]. Moreover, mediaeval Arabic written sources regarding trade in Central and Western Asia refer to ‘fish teeth' interpreted as walrus tusks acquired in or via what are now Ukraine and Russia, valued for making knife handles and sword hilts [ 13 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%