Combatting neo-Colonialism in Health Research: What can Aboriginal Health Research Ethics and Global Health Research Ethics Teach Each Other?

Abstract

The ethics of research involving Aboriginal populations and low and middle-income country populations each developed out of a long history of exploitative research projects and partnerships. Commonalities and differences between the two fields have not yet been examined. This study undertook two independent literature searches for Aboriginal health research ethics and global health research ethics. Content analysis identified shared and differently emphasised ethical principles and concepts between the two fields. Shared ethical concepts like “benefit” and “capacity development” have been developed to guide collaborations in both Aboriginal health research and global health research. However, Aboriginal health research ethics gives much greater prominence to ethical principles that assist in decolonising research practice such as “self-determination”, “community-control”, and “community ownership”. The paper argues that global health research ethics would benefit from giving greater emphasis to these principles to guide research practice, while justice as approached in global health research ethics may inform Aboriginal health research practice. With increasing attention being drawn to the need to decolonise global health research, the lessons Aboriginal health research ethics can offer may be especially timely.

The Use of mHealth Apps for the Assessment and Management of Diabetes-Related Foot Health Outcomes: Systematic Review

“…mHealth apps must be culturally safe and therefore must actively engage with, and privilege, First Nations epistemologies and ontologies [ 49 , 50 ] (eg, locally produced mHealth strategies that privilege First Nations voices, incorporate culturally appropriate content as judged by local Communities, and promote engagement through alternative mediums to text such as graphics and animations that have been demonstrated to have the best chance of successful implementation [ 25 ]). It is through these approaches that First Nations Communities are empowered to take control and have ownership of their own health and well-being [ 48 , 51 ].…”

Is neocolonialism existing in global surgery practice? An analysis of a web-based survey amongst global surgery practitioners

“…This scenario contributes to the low output of high-quality publications from LMICs and varying aspects of such occurrences have been subjects of a some reports. 18,19 The findings regarding research need to be put in some context. First, in one review of 1240 published articles and 9301 authors, 51% of authors were affiliated with only HICs, 45% affiliated with only LMICs, and two-thirds of first and last authors were affiliated with at least one HIC institutions.…”