2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2016.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combatting nonlinear phase noise in coherent optical systems with an optimized decision processor based on machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although machine learning based equalization techniques have been extensively studied in wireless systems [14,15], only lately they have been considered for application in fibre transmission systems. A number of techniques, such as, k-nearest neighbors algorithm [16], affinity propagation clustering [17], statistical sequence equalizers [18], expectation maximization algorithms with Gaussian mixture models [19] and support vector machines [20][21][22], have been proposed combining the nonlinear equalization (NLE) functionality with optimum symbol classification. This means that they can adapt their decision boundaries to the residual nonlinear distortion of the received signal instead of performing hard decision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although machine learning based equalization techniques have been extensively studied in wireless systems [14,15], only lately they have been considered for application in fibre transmission systems. A number of techniques, such as, k-nearest neighbors algorithm [16], affinity propagation clustering [17], statistical sequence equalizers [18], expectation maximization algorithms with Gaussian mixture models [19] and support vector machines [20][21][22], have been proposed combining the nonlinear equalization (NLE) functionality with optimum symbol classification. This means that they can adapt their decision boundaries to the residual nonlinear distortion of the received signal instead of performing hard decision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the training process it is necessary to adapt certain parameters of the optimization problem to the characteristics of the input data. The aim is to avoid over-or underfitted systems, which leads to a significantly reduced classification accuracy [12]. The adaptation and verification is implemented using the two optimization algorithms Grid-Search and Cross Validation [12,18].…”
Section: Svm-based Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim is to avoid over-or underfitted systems, which leads to a significantly reduced classification accuracy [12]. The adaptation and verification is implemented using the two optimization algorithms Grid-Search and Cross Validation [12,18]. In the optimization process, 70% of the training data is used for training and 30% for validation.…”
Section: Svm-based Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, all proposed nonlinearity compensators present high complexity [3][4][5][6][7] being impractical for real-time communications. The aforementioned random noises of the network can be partially tackled by low-complex digital machine learning algorithms that perform nonlinear equalization (NLE), such as unsupervised and supervised algorithms: machine learning clustering (MLC) with K-means and Gaussian mixture [8][9][10], and classification machines [11], e.g. artificial neural networks (ANN) [12][13][14] and convolutional neural network-based deep learning [15,16].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%