ture has been reported to influence human performance. Performance is reported to be better when body temperature is high/near its circadian peak and worse when body temperature is low/near its circadian minimum. We assessed whether this relationship between performance and body temperature reflects the regulation of both the internal biological timekeeping system and/or the influence of body temperature on performance independent of circadian phase. Fourteen subjects participated in a forced desynchrony protocol allowing assessment of the relationship between body temperature and performance while controlling for circadian phase and hours awake. Most neurobehavioral measures varied as a function of internal biological time and duration of wakefulness. A number of performance measures were better when body temperature was elevated, including working memory, subjective alertness, visual attention, and the slowest 10% of reaction times. These findings demonstrate that an increased body temperature, associated with and independent of internal biological time, is correlated with improved performance and alertness. These results support the hypothesis that body temperature modulates neurobehavioral function in humans. sleep homeostasis; circadian phase; neurobehavioral performance; forced desynchrony; core body temperature CONSIDERABLE EFFORT has been devoted to understanding the relationship between body temperature and human performance (2,4,12,24,34,48). Kleitman (32-34) originally proposed that body temperature was an underlying mechanism regulating performance. "Assuming that the effect of temperature indicates that we are dealing with a chemical phenomenon, there are two interpretations of the relationship between temperature and reaction time possible: either a, mental processes represent chemical reactions in themselves, or b, the speed of thinking depends upon the level of metabolic activity of the cells of the cerebral cortex, and by the raising of the latter through an increase in body temperature we indirectly speed up the thought process" (Ref. 34, p. 501). Kleitman's hypothesis is supported by results from studies using in vitro and in vivo preparations in which it was reported that synaptic function is altered by supraphysiological changes in brain temperature (39,40,47) such that higher brain temperatures resulted in faster transmission, whereas lower brain temperature resulted in slower transmission.Brain mechanisms involved in the regulation of body temperature include the preoptic area and the suprachiasmatic nuclei, both of which are located in the hypothalamus. The preoptic area regulates homeostatic mechanisms to maintain body and brain temperature in mammals within a limited range in response to physiological and environmental conditions, and the suprachiasmatic nuclei regulate the circadian or near-24-h rhythm of temperature (28,43,44). Homeostatic and circadian mechanisms influence cutaneous vasodilatation, peripheral vasoconstriction, and basal metabolism, all of which change the rate at whi...