2011
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.22840
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of complex‐based and magnitude‐based multiecho water‐fat separation for accurate quantification of fat‐fraction

Abstract: Multipoint water–fat separation techniques rely on different water–fat phase shifts generated at multiple echo times to decompose water and fat. Therefore, these methods require complex source images and allow unambiguous separation of water and fat signals. However, complex-based water–fat separation methods are sensitive to phase errors in the source images, which may lead to clinically important errors. An alternative approach to quantify fat is through “magnitude-based” methods that acquire multiecho magni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
239
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(246 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
6
239
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, if this knowledge is not given a rugged method described in [49] can be easily applied to reveal the dominating signal fraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if this knowledge is not given a rugged method described in [49] can be easily applied to reveal the dominating signal fraction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MRI reconstruction and water-fat image separation steps were performed using a robust hybrid magnitude-and complex-based method (65). Prior to analysis, the first echo of each four-echo train was discarded to avoid potential phase contamination by eddy currents in the complex water-fat signal (26).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A magnitude-based technique was applied to echo sequences to avoid phase errors, which can adversely affect fat quantification. 31, 32 This algorithm is applied to the source images using custom analysis software developed at the UCSD Liver Imaging Group to generate a PDFF parametric map depicting fat quantity and distribution throughout the pancreas and liver. This method provides a more direct measure of liver fat content than prior MR techniques that relied on measurements of the image signal fat-fraction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%