2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of cytogenetic classification and MRD status correlates with outcome of autologous versus allogeneic stem cell transplantation in adults with primary acute myeloid leukemia in first remission

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another study conducted by Balsat et al showed that a 4‐log reduction in NPM1 level after one cycle of chemotherapy was significantly associated with a good outcome, independently of the FLT3 mutational status. They also showed that allo‐SCT was able to significantly improve survival in patient with poor molecular response, which has been confirmed in another report . However, in our cohort of 102 patients with complete molecular response, we still found a significant benefit of MSD‐SCT over other transplant strategies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Another study conducted by Balsat et al showed that a 4‐log reduction in NPM1 level after one cycle of chemotherapy was significantly associated with a good outcome, independently of the FLT3 mutational status. They also showed that allo‐SCT was able to significantly improve survival in patient with poor molecular response, which has been confirmed in another report . However, in our cohort of 102 patients with complete molecular response, we still found a significant benefit of MSD‐SCT over other transplant strategies.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In one study [30], patients with wild-type NPM1(NPM1 wt ) without FLT3-ITD or with a low allelic burden of FLT3-ITD (< 0.5) were considered as intermediate-risk group ­because of similar OS and RFS at 5 years. In the other 3 studies, their intermediate-risk AML were FLT3-ITD wild-type (FLT3-ITD wt ) and NPM1 wt [17, 31, 32]. On the basis of whether data on FLT3-ITD were available or not, we divided the included studies into two subgroups: FLT3-ITD wt and FLT3-ITD unknown (FLT3-ITD uk ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the intermediate-1 group, which included AML with FLT3-ITD mut , autoSCT was inferior to alloSCT for RFS (39 vs. 70%, p < 10 –6 ) and OS (61 vs. 74%, p = 0.005). In the other study [31], patients were stratified on the basis of cytogenetic and molecular abnormalities as well as MRD status. For patients with favorable and intermediate risks and negative MRD after one course of consolidation chemotherapy, autoSCT and alloSCT offered comparable outcomes; otherwise, autoSCT was inferior owing to a higher risk of leukemia relapse.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2 prospective HOVON-SAKK phase III trials, comparable OS was observed in patients with intermediaterisk AML following ASCT and allo-SCT in CR1 [5]. In a retrospective study of 172 patients with AML in CR1, OS and disease-free survival (DFS) did not differ significantly between patients who underwent ASCT and those who underwent MSD-allo-SCT [18]. Mizutani et al [12] evaluated survival outcomes after autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (n = 357) and MSD-allo-SCT from bone marrow (n = 521) or peripheral blood (n = 380) in patients with AML in CR1 and found that although RR after ASCT was relatively higher, NRM was significantly lower compared with MSD-allo-SCT, and LFS did not differ significantly in multivariate analyses.…”
Section: Asct Versus Allo-sctmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Yoon et al [21] reported similar outcomes in 240 patients with AML in CR1 who underwent ASCT following a conditioning regimen including total body irradiation (TBI; 1200 cGy), cytarabine (9 g/m 2 ), and melphalan (100 mg/m 2 ); OS decreased as the cytogenetic risk increased at 5 years after ASCT, with the highest 5-year OS in 19 patients carrying t(8;21) with isolated Y chromosome loss. In a previous study, we identified cytogenetic risk as an independent prognostic factor for survival outcomes, with decreasing OS and DFS as risk increased [18]. Gorin et al [3] compared ASCT with MUD-allo-SCT in patients with AML in CR1 and showed that favorable-risk patients benefited more from ASCT, intermediate-risk 2 patients had comparable outcomes after ASCT or MUD-allo-SCT, and intermediate-risk 1 patients had superior clinical outcomes after allo-SCT.…”
Section: Cytogenetic and Molecular Risk Stratificationmentioning
confidence: 98%