2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of equilibrium models and hybrid life cycle - input–output analysis to predict the environmental impacts of energy policy scenarios

Abstract: Nowadays, many countries adopt an active agenda to mitigate the impact of greenhouse gas emissions by moving towards less polluting energy generation technologies. The environmental costs, directly or indirectly generated to achieve such a challenging objective, remain however largely underexplored. Until now, research has focused either on pure economic approaches such as computable general equilibrium (CGE) and partial equilibrium (PE) models, or on (physical) energy supply scenarios. These latter could be u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless the temporal issue related to the C emission (addressed in the next paragraph), general (e.g., GTAP) or partial (e.g., FAPRI) economic equilibrium models have a different scope (compared with deterministic models specifically developed for LCA) as they aim at modeling how global/partial market segments reach an equilibrium (a balance) in a relatively short‐ term after inducing a particular shock in the market (e.g., a specific biofuel policy/strategy), in comparison with a business‐as‐usual scenario (e.g., Igos et al ., ). They thus include short‐term effects on prices and related price elasticities (which is not consistent with the principle of ‘full elasticity of supply’ typically applied in consequential LCA, see Weidema et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Regardless the temporal issue related to the C emission (addressed in the next paragraph), general (e.g., GTAP) or partial (e.g., FAPRI) economic equilibrium models have a different scope (compared with deterministic models specifically developed for LCA) as they aim at modeling how global/partial market segments reach an equilibrium (a balance) in a relatively short‐ term after inducing a particular shock in the market (e.g., a specific biofuel policy/strategy), in comparison with a business‐as‐usual scenario (e.g., Igos et al ., ). They thus include short‐term effects on prices and related price elasticities (which is not consistent with the principle of ‘full elasticity of supply’ typically applied in consequential LCA, see Weidema et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…); or energy generation under different scenarios (Igos et al. ; Pietrapertosa et al. ; Eriksson et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was picked up throughout the years to present times (cf., e.g., Messner and Schrattenholzer, 2000;Schäfer and Jacoby, 2006;Martinsen, 2011) where it appears to flourish (cf. the above 3 recent papers but also Igos et al, 2015). bottom-up model as they are in the open-economy singleregion versions of IMACLIM-S 24 .…”
Section: Coupling Through Iterative Convergence Of Linking Variables mentioning
confidence: 99%