2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2019.03.068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of extraction induced by microemulsion-breaking and pre-concentration using magnetic nanoparticles for multi-element determination of Cd, Cr, Cu and Pb in gasoline samples using energy dispersive X-ray fluorescence spectrometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences obtained in the EF values may be related to the different affinities and retention process of each element with the AFB-impregnated CoFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles. These EF agree with those obtained previously when MSPME was also used for multielement determination, and the EF were found to be 10, 13, and 25 for Cd, Cu, and Pb, respectively …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The differences obtained in the EF values may be related to the different affinities and retention process of each element with the AFB-impregnated CoFe 2 O 4 nanoparticles. These EF agree with those obtained previously when MSPME was also used for multielement determination, and the EF were found to be 10, 13, and 25 for Cd, Cu, and Pb, respectively …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Previous work has shown that pH values below 4 do not show significant extractions when cobalt nanoparticles were used for metal extraction; and, for pH values above 10, a decay of extractions was observed, probably due to the formation of precipitates. 18,38 In addition, in the case of CoFe 2 O 4 impregnated with AFB, solubilization of the complexant in an alkaline medium may occur. This fact was observed when solutions with pH values above 8.0 were used.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The comparison of analytical characteristics of UASPME/ICP-OES method for preconcentration of As(III), Cd(II), Cr(III), Co(II), Ni(II), and Pb(II) ions with previously researched preconcentration procedures specifically (solid-phase based extraction) reported in the literature are summarised in Table 7. It was observed that the proposed method had superior LOD, EF, RSD, and linear range compared to those reported elsewhere 42,43 . In the addition, parameters such as liner calibration range, LOD, EF, and RSD for UASPME/ICP-OES technique were www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Regeneration studies.…”
Section: Analytical Figures Of Merit and Methods Validation Analyticamentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Compared with the above-mentioned conventional methods, X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF) is an important spectroscopy technology for the rapid detection of heavy metals. Because of the advantages of non-destructiveness for the sample, simultaneous determination of multiple elements, less spectral line interference, fast measurement speed and good reproducibility [10], XRF spectrometry has been an effective method for rapid, real-time and online analysis of heavy metal elements. However, when XRF spectrometry is directly applied to detect heavy metals in water samples, there are two main problems: The first one is when aqueous solution is irradiated by high energy X-rays, some chemical reactions will happen between elements in the irradiated part due to local heating, at the same time some phenomena such as bubbling and precipitation will appear, which makes the X-ray fluorescence intensity very easy to change and seriously affects the reproducibility and stability of the analytical signal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%