2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of gel-electromembrane extraction with switchable hydrophilicity solvent-based homogeneous liquid-liquid microextraction followed by gas chromatography for the extraction and determination of antidepressants in human serum, breast milk and wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More recently, Behpour et al [138] developed a gelbased electromembrane microextraction (EME) coupled with switchable hydrophilicity solvent-based liquid-liquid microextraction procedure to quantify antidepressants in breast milk, serum and wastewater samples. The technique provided growth of enrichment factor over original EME, reducing limits of detection (LODs) and limits of quantification (LOQs); and the use of low volume of organic solvent allowed the analysis by gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (GC-FID), which usually cannot be performed with EME due to its aqueous acceptor phase, which is often analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) [138]. Sempio et al [139] developed an LC-MS/MS method for quantification of 12 cannabinoids in 30 samples from a clinical study and 6 samples from a breast milk bank and compared the analysis' results with ELISA immunological assay.…”
Section: Breast Milkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Behpour et al [138] developed a gelbased electromembrane microextraction (EME) coupled with switchable hydrophilicity solvent-based liquid-liquid microextraction procedure to quantify antidepressants in breast milk, serum and wastewater samples. The technique provided growth of enrichment factor over original EME, reducing limits of detection (LODs) and limits of quantification (LOQs); and the use of low volume of organic solvent allowed the analysis by gas chromatography with flame ionization detector (GC-FID), which usually cannot be performed with EME due to its aqueous acceptor phase, which is often analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection (HPLC-UV) [138]. Sempio et al [139] developed an LC-MS/MS method for quantification of 12 cannabinoids in 30 samples from a clinical study and 6 samples from a breast milk bank and compared the analysis' results with ELISA immunological assay.…”
Section: Breast Milkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite all the above, SHSs have not attracted the interest compared with other alternative solvents used in liquidphase microextraction techniques. First of all, in spite of employing CO 2 for the solubilization step, the subsequent pH change is normally performed with strong acids [14][15][16] or strong bases [17,18]. Second, about their safety, some SHSs (especially, those formed from secondary amines) are expected to be safer than traditional solvents in some terms like flammability or smog formation [19].…”
Section: Switchable Hydrophilicity Solventsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different analytical techniques were used to quantitatively determine CIT in aquatic samples. Among these methods are liquid chromatography (Sarıkaya et al 2021 ), gas chromatography (Behpour et al 2020 ), differential pulse voltammetry (Madej et al 2019 ), tandem mass spectrometry (Evans et al 2015 ) and capillary electrophoresis (Himmelsbach et al 2006 ). In order to avoid undesired accumulation of CIT in aquatic environments, different treatment methods were employed such as adsorption (Ek et al 2014 ; Guillossou et al 2019 ; Sharifabadi et al 2013 ), membrane bioreactor process (Arola et al 2017 ) and gamma radiation (Bojanowska-Czajka et al 2022 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%