2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.crvi.2017.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of morphological and molecular markers for the characterization of ancient native olive accessions in Central-Eastern Tunisia

Abstract: Increasing olive germplasm erosion in the coastline of Tunisia has required an imperious conservation of the traditional genotypes before an ultimate disappearance. This region has been relatively neglected in the literature sources of olive identification. In this context, a prospection effort and a preliminary selection of olive accessions belonging to Central-Eastern Tunisia was carried out. Twenty-seven ancient olive accessions were studied by combining molecular and morphological data in order to fingerpr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
4
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the remaining parameters (presence of nipple, number of lenticules, colour when the fruit reaches the definitive colour when mature) similar ranges were found among the three studied populations (Table 1). Concerning the morphological parameters of the endocarp, the stone weight significantly varied from 0.32 g (Alijó location) to 0.20 g (VNFC location) (p-value < 0.0001), similar to the lower results reported by [27] for ancient native olive accessions in Central-Eastern Tunisia populations (i.e., 0.15-1.23 g, for endocarps) and 3.5-6.0 times lower than the weights usually reported for the endocarps of cultivated olive cultivars of the same Portuguese region [26]. Among the three populations, the lowest values for endocarp length, width and shape were obtained in the VNFC population, being consistently and significantly higher in the Alijó population (p-value < 0.0001).…”
Section: Morphological Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the remaining parameters (presence of nipple, number of lenticules, colour when the fruit reaches the definitive colour when mature) similar ranges were found among the three studied populations (Table 1). Concerning the morphological parameters of the endocarp, the stone weight significantly varied from 0.32 g (Alijó location) to 0.20 g (VNFC location) (p-value < 0.0001), similar to the lower results reported by [27] for ancient native olive accessions in Central-Eastern Tunisia populations (i.e., 0.15-1.23 g, for endocarps) and 3.5-6.0 times lower than the weights usually reported for the endocarps of cultivated olive cultivars of the same Portuguese region [26]. Among the three populations, the lowest values for endocarp length, width and shape were obtained in the VNFC population, being consistently and significantly higher in the Alijó population (p-value < 0.0001).…”
Section: Morphological Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The tocopherol profile was similarly to that of olive oil, with α-tocopherol representing more than 90% of the total tocopherol content [33]. The amounts quantified in the present work were much higher than those observed for oleaster oil from Algeria, which varied from 87 to 182 mg/kg of oil [7] and Turkey, with values lower than 40 mg/kg of oil [34] but were of the same order of magnitude of those reported by Baccouri [27], for seven populations from Tunisia (309.5-781.8 mg/kg of oil); and by Dabbou [12] that analysed two Tunisian samples and reported α-tocopherol contents of 313-390 mg/kg of oil.…”
Section: Tocopherols Compositionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In this study, the MCA analysis showed that the shape of the fruit, weight and shape of the stone in addition to the position of its maximal transversal diameter as well as its -cation. Similarly, our results of PCA also corroborate those of Laaribi et al (2017) and Dridi et al (2018), showing that the weight of the olive and the stone are positively correlated and were the most discriminating quantitative characteristics compared to the other biometric parameters of these parts while the number of grooves remains the least discriminating. Moreover, several studies demonstrated the superiority of the discriminative power of the characteristics of the endocarp (Barranco, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, several studies demonstrated the superiority of the discriminative power of the characteristics of the endocarp (Barranco, 1994). In our case, the contribution of the characters of the fruit and the stone were very close with a slight superiority for those of the fruit with 50.8 and by Cantini et al (1999) and Laaribi et al (2017), emphasizing the importance of fruit traits for the recognition of olive cultivars. However, the use of pomological characters alone may lead to incomplete differentiation results (Hannachi et al, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…DNA genotyping by microsatellite markers or simple sequence repeats (SSRs) is the most suitable method for olive genetic variability studies [ 18 , 26 , 27 , 28 ]. A different set of markers, tested in true-to-type reference material, have been proposed as standard lists to be used for olive cultivar identification [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ], being those within the consensus list of 11 loci proposed by Baldoni et al [ 30 ] for olive genotyping the most used [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 13 , 21 , 28 , 33 , 34 ]. Moreover, the molecular and morphological characterization of the two Worldwide Olive Germplasm Banks (WOGB) of Córdoba [ 31 ] and Morocco [ 32 , 33 ] provided an important tool for scientists, nurseries and breeders.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%