2018
DOI: 10.4103/sni.sni_62_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination of the tubular retractor and brain spatulas provides an adequate operative field in surgery for deep-seated lesions: Case series and technical note

Abstract: Background:Surgeries for deep-seated lesions are challenging because making a corridor and observing the interface between lesions and normal brain tissue are difficult. The ViewSite Brain Access System, which is a clear plastic tubular retractor system, is used for resection of deep-seated lesions. However, the tapered shape of this system may result in limitation of the surgical field and cause brain injury to observe the interface between lesions and normal tissue. In this study, we evaluated the usefulness… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Another well-known commercial model available is the ViewSite (Vycor Medical), which is a clear plastic retractor that also offers the possibility to change the length in 3 different sizes (3 cm, 5 cm and 7 cm) and 4 widths (12 cm, 17 cm, 21 cm, and 28 mm). 10 There is no statistical difference reported in the literature between the different commercial types of tubular retractors regarding the rate of postoperative complications. 11,12 Studies show an equivalence in effectiveness when different types of retractors were compared.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Another well-known commercial model available is the ViewSite (Vycor Medical), which is a clear plastic retractor that also offers the possibility to change the length in 3 different sizes (3 cm, 5 cm and 7 cm) and 4 widths (12 cm, 17 cm, 21 cm, and 28 mm). 10 There is no statistical difference reported in the literature between the different commercial types of tubular retractors regarding the rate of postoperative complications. 11,12 Studies show an equivalence in effectiveness when different types of retractors were compared.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tubular MIA technique has been described in detail, as well as its benefits and utilities. This technique is associated with the use of neuronavigation, tractography and intraoperative monitoring, which makes it an ideal approach to prevent damage as much as possible, achieving an optimal resection rate versus neurological integrity [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ]. A critical aspect that deserves attention is the preoperative assessment of the white matter tracts that will guide the intraoperative neuronavigation phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Irrespective of approach, the location and anatomical configuration of AIMs require safe navigation through the subcortical space, [9][10][11][12] violation of which can cause postoperative visual, motor, and/or cognitive deficits. 7 Proposed benefits of a tubular, port, or channel-based retractor include the reduction in collateral injury to surrounding white matter tracts, [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21] improved surgeon ergonomics, 22,23 less tissue breach into the surgical field, improved visualization, and versatility when used in adjunct with other approaches and techniques (e.g., endoscopeassisted or fluorescence-guided resection.). [23][24][25] As this is a relatively recent technology, the tumor features lending themselves to selection of channel-based exoscopic surgery for AIMs are not yet well defined.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%