2021
DOI: 10.1080/13543784.2021.2014814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination therapies in clinical trials for renal cell carcinoma: how could they impact future treatments?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the survival rate of mccRCC patients is undoubtedly increased by the combination of classical clinical therapies, fully durable responses are rare currently ( 82 ). Additionally, combined therapies have limited effects on patients who are insensitive to anti-angiogenic therapies and have failed ICI treatment ( 83 ).…”
Section: Classical Clinical Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the survival rate of mccRCC patients is undoubtedly increased by the combination of classical clinical therapies, fully durable responses are rare currently ( 82 ). Additionally, combined therapies have limited effects on patients who are insensitive to anti-angiogenic therapies and have failed ICI treatment ( 83 ).…”
Section: Classical Clinical Treatmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They can enhance the inhibition of cell proliferation and cell growth, and also enhance the inhibition of angiogenesis in cancers ( Rausch et al, 2020 ; Sharma et al, 2021 ). However, combination therapies may cause undesirable drug interactions and unnecessary drug toxicity ( Zou et al, 2019 ; Ince and Eisen, 2021 ). To avoid the mentioned problem, we intend to combine HDAC1 with other targets to develop dual-targeting inhibitors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, the prognosis of metastatic RCC patients is still poor, with the 5-years survival rate remaining at 10–15%. Thus, there is an urgent need to find reliable biomarkers to predict RCC patient outcomes ( Kabaria et al, 2016 ; Reed et al, 2019 ; Lee et al, 2021a ; Bedke et al, 2021 ; Doppalapudi et al, 2021 ; Ince and Eisen, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%