“…The tool is suitable for reviews including randomised and non-randomised studies. It includes 16 domains (7 considered critical) relating to the research question, review design, search strategy, study selection, data extraction, justification for excluded stud- Lee, 2020 [13] Li, 2020 [14] Yang, 2020 [15] Cantini, 2020 [16] Cheng, 2020 [17] Wang, 2020 [18] Sarma, 2020 [19] Tlayjeh, 2020 [20] WHO REACT Working Group, 2020 [21] Ye, 2020 [22] Van Paassen, 2020 [23] Chaudhuri, 2021 [24] Hasan, 2021 [25] Ma, 2021 [26] Pasin, 2021 [27] Pulakurthi, 2021 [28] Sahu, 2021 [29] Tu, 2021 [30] Cano, 2021 [31] Moosazadeh, 2021 [32] Nguyen, 2021 [33] Ferreto, 2021 [34] Yu, 2021 [35] Sahilu, 2021 [36] Boppana, 2021 [37] Wagner, 2021 [38] ies, description of included studies, risk of bias, sources of funding, meta-analysis, heterogeneity, publication bias, and conflicts of interest (see Table 2 for details of each question). Two review authors (MC, IP) independently assessed the quality of evidence in the included reviews and the methodological quality of the SRs.…”