2022
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.159090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combination therapy with remdesivir and monoclonal antibodies protects nonhuman primates against advanced Sudan virus disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, treatment with both products in combination beginning 6 dpi showed 80% survival (n = 4/5). A similar result was seen when remdesivir was used in combination with a SUDV mAb cocktail MBP431 [54]. These data support further testing of combination therapies toward decreasing the case fatality of acute filovirus disease and urge similar evaluation in NHP EBOV challenge models.…”
Section: After the Palm Rct: Improving Outcomes In Severe Diseasesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…However, treatment with both products in combination beginning 6 dpi showed 80% survival (n = 4/5). A similar result was seen when remdesivir was used in combination with a SUDV mAb cocktail MBP431 [54]. These data support further testing of combination therapies toward decreasing the case fatality of acute filovirus disease and urge similar evaluation in NHP EBOV challenge models.…”
Section: After the Palm Rct: Improving Outcomes In Severe Diseasesupporting
confidence: 68%
“…This dose is significantly lower than the currently FDA approved mAb treatments, which are 50 mg/kg and 150 mg/kg for mAb114 and REGN-EB3, respectively [18]. It remains to be determined if lower doses of MBP431 tested here in combination with small molecule-based treatments like Remdesivir could amplify protective efficacy in more severe cases via augmented biodistribution, as was observed in recent combination studies for the treatment of SUDV and Marburgvirus infection [19,20]. Future experiments will also focus on the prophylactic utility of MBP431 when administered IM in NHP models of ebolavirus infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The data from this study confirm the cynomolgus macaque model as an appropriate model for evaluation of MARV countermeasures and the clinical presentation is reproducible when compared to published studies [ 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ]. The rapid time course of the disease in this model after onset of clinical signs makes the identification of triggers for medical intervention problematic, implying that time-based intervention, as used for the models to evaluate Ebola countermeasures, is most appropriate [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 ]. Development of medical countermeasures against filoviruses and other high-consequence pathogens poses an ethical challenge to the traditional pathway to regulatory approval through demonstration of efficacy in well-designed and monitored clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%