2007
DOI: 10.3233/jae-2007-909
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combinatorial and multi-level optimizations of a safety isolating transformer

Abstract: Two analytical models and two finite element models (2D and 3D) are built and compared in terms of accuracy and computation time. They can be used as a benchmark to compare algorithms for multi-level and combinatorial optimizations. The discrete optimization of the transformer is done using branch and bound methods. The multi-level optimization is performed using one analytical model and the 3D FE model jointly thanks to the space-mapping techniques.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when using a class of coarse models that are numerically built and that approximate relatively accurate the fine model or the system under study, the ratio s will be very low and because of their relatively good quality, they will lead to a better convergence in the RDO scheme rather than in ASM. This can qualitatively be concluded by comparing the time equations associated with the acceleration A 1 , see (2) in the ASM, and acceleration A 2 , see (11) in the RDO. It is difficult to provide a quantitative comparison since the time equations depend on some constants (i.e.…”
Section: Rdo Scheme For the Optimal Design Of A Srmmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when using a class of coarse models that are numerically built and that approximate relatively accurate the fine model or the system under study, the ratio s will be very low and because of their relatively good quality, they will lead to a better convergence in the RDO scheme rather than in ASM. This can qualitatively be concluded by comparing the time equations associated with the acceleration A 1 , see (2) in the ASM, and acceleration A 2 , see (11) in the RDO. It is difficult to provide a quantitative comparison since the time equations depend on some constants (i.e.…”
Section: Rdo Scheme For the Optimal Design Of A Srmmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Indeed, these two-level optimization methods were successfully applied onto different electromagnetic devices. For example, the space mapping technique was applied onto the efficient optimal design of electromagnetic actuators [8,9], optimal design of a SRM [10], a transformer [11] etc. In [8][9][10], the used coarse models were mostly analytical models, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal design of the safety isolation transformer is a complex problem, which requires accounting for different physical phenomena. The transformer can be represented by an analytical model [1]. Usually, analytical models can be solved within fast number evaluations and with acceptable level of accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paper presents the multidisciplinary optimal design of a single-phase low-voltage safety isolation transformer, introduced as benchmark problem in Tran et al (2007a). The transformer is represented through an analytical modeling (Tran et al, 2007b), benefiting from a fast evaluation and with a fair accuracy. The analytical model of the transformer represents in fact a coupling between three disciplinary models: two electromagnetic models (full-load (EMM L ), respectively, no-load (EMM 0 )) and a thermal model (THM).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%