2009
DOI: 10.1134/s000511790902012x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combinatorial methods for constructing bipartite uniform minimal quasicomplete graphs (symmetrical block designs)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the advantages of this structure when it operates correctly [1] is that any pair of vertices from subset X is related via a single vertex from subset Y . This is exactly the vertex from subset Y that appears as a suspect when two vertices from subset X fail at the same time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…One of the advantages of this structure when it operates correctly [1] is that any pair of vertices from subset X is related via a single vertex from subset Y . This is exactly the vertex from subset Y that appears as a suspect when two vertices from subset X fail at the same time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) fill with dashes (-) the cells in rows A 1 , A Z ; 4) then write in the cells of these rows diagnostic results according to the following rules: a) write 1 to cells on the intersections of row A 1 and columns titled with symbols of vertices u3, u8, u1 since cells of these columns located above contain at least one 1 and do not contain any zeros; b) write Z to cells on the intersections of row A Z and 7 columns titled with symbols of arcs l(j−i) since at least one of the vertices (j or i) that each of these arcs connect is suspected to be faulty (there is a 1 in the corresponding cell of row A 1 ); 5) deciphering the resulting records in rows A 1 and A Z , we get the following diagnostic conclusions: a) according to the locations of ones in row A 1 , processors 1 and 3 and memory unit 8 are suspected to be faulty, even though the original fault situation included only vertices 1 and 3; vertex 8 is suspected to be faulty since this triple fault (1,8,3) is indistinguishable from the original double fault (1, 3), as we have shown in Section 3; b) according to the locations of Z symbols in row A Z , state of the communication lines (13-3), (14-3), (8-3), (8-2), (8-1), (9-1), and (10-1) remains unknown since their manifestations are "masked" by the state of adjacent vertices 1, 3, 8 that are suspected to be faulty.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations