Combinatorial Signal Perception in the BMP Pathway

Abstract

Summary The Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) signaling pathway comprises multiple ligands and receptors that interact promiscuously with one another, and typically appear in combinations. This feature is often explained in terms of redundancy and regulatory flexibility, but it has remained unclear what signal processing capabilities it provides. Here, we show that the BMP pathway processes multi-ligand inputs using a specific repertoire of computations, including ratiometric sensing, balance detection and imbalance detection. These computations operate on the relative levels of different ligands, and can arise directly from competitive receptor-ligand interactions. Furthermore, cells can select different computations to perform on the same ligand combination through expression of alternative sets of receptor variants. These results provide a direct signal processing role for promiscuous receptor-ligand interactions, and establish operational principles for quantitatively controlling cells with BMP ligands. Similar principles could apply to other promiscuous signaling pathways.

Surfaceome dynamics during neuronal development and synaptic plasticity reveal system-wide surfaceome reorganization independent of global proteostasis

“…The vast number of proteoforms that contribute to different processes in parallel, with generally unclear interdependencies, gives rise to a complexity that has been beyond comprehension 6,7,52,65,74 . Furthermore, cells are capable of elaborate computations, even for reductionist model systems and isolated molecular events 8,75 , raising the possibility that bioinformatic models and analyses will be required to decipher nontrivial relationships. To implement such modeling, detailed knowledge about all molecules involved, their mechanisms of action and their interplay with appropriate spatial and temporal resolution is required.…”

“…Although the molecular mechanisms remain elusive, it has been hypothesized that different surface molecules act in a combinatorial fashion without obvious hierarchy in signaling 7 . In order to understand, manipulate, and model the underlying molecular principles, the key cell-surface players involved in neuronal development and plasticity need to be identified and the dynamic interplay of these factors have to be characterized 8 .…”

Engineering Cell‐Surface Receptors with DNA Nanotechnology for Cell Manipulation

“…In the bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) signaling pathway, for example, more than 30 different ligands interact with only seven different receptors. When exposed to combinations of different BMP ligands, cells use their repertoire of BMP receptors to perceive mixed ligand milieus and to orchestrate both homodimerization and heterodimerization of different receptors, with conversion into specific signaling output patterns, leading to distinct cell fate decisions . In the case of TCR signaling, ligand discrimination, intracellular signaling propagation, and T‐cell activation depend on the kinetic proofreading function of ligand‐triggered receptor clustering, which could be affected by the ligand density and affinity of TCR ligands …”

“…When exposed to combinations of different BMP ligands, cells use their repertoire of BMP receptorst op erceive mixed ligand milieus and to orchestrate both homodimerization and heterodimerization of different receptors, with conversion into specific signaling output patterns, leadingt od istinct cell fate decisions. [12] In the case of TCRs ignaling, ligand discrimination,i ntracellular signaling propagation, and T-cell activationd epend on the kinetic proofreading function of ligand-triggered receptor clustering, which could be affected by the ligand density and affinity of TCR ligands. [13] However, detailed mechanismso fi ntracellular signaling determined by the status of the receptor assembly remain controversiald ue to the lack of precise regulatory tools.T herefore, it is highlyd esirable to develope ngineering-baseda pproaches to achieve controlled modulation of receptor-mediated molecular processes for several specific aims:1 )improving understanding of the mechanistic role of the complex response of natural ligand/receptor systems in downstream signal transductiona nd cell behavior decision making, and 2) reprogramming of receptor-mediated molecular signaling pathways to control cellular functions such as cell adhesion,p roliferation, migration, and differentiation.…”

Biocomputing with Nanostructures on Lipid Bilayers

“…The field of biocomputation—inspired by how living systems autonomously control the flow of matter and information—offers a wide array of strategies to achieve algorithmic manipulation of biomolecules in natural and synthetic platforms . Over the past two decades, biocomputing technologies, building upon the advances in molecular programming, synthetic biology, and DNA nanotechnology, have contributed to the development of single‐cell systems biology, synthetic genetic circuits, and DNA‐based logic circuits, neural networks, and dynamical systems . Around the same time, new opportunities have emerged at the interface between nanotechnology and biocomputation, focusing on algorithmically controlling a system of nanostructures and biomolecules.…”