2014 IEEE 15th International Symposium on High-Assurance Systems Engineering 2014
DOI: 10.1109/hase.2014.18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combinatorial Test Generation for Software Product Lines Using Minimum Invalid Tuples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed strategy was compared with the existing tway strategy to evaluate the performance of SPL-HS strategy during the t-way testing. The results were obtained from a previous study that a test generation research tool called LOOKUP performs better than the existing test generation tools in term of test size and execution time [6]. Table 6 demonstrates that SPL-HS has produced superior results in most of the cases.…”
Section: B Experimental Results On T-waymentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed strategy was compared with the existing tway strategy to evaluate the performance of SPL-HS strategy during the t-way testing. The results were obtained from a previous study that a test generation research tool called LOOKUP performs better than the existing test generation tools in term of test size and execution time [6]. Table 6 demonstrates that SPL-HS has produced superior results in most of the cases.…”
Section: B Experimental Results On T-waymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…PICT uses random selection to generate a test suite. As an alternate, LOOKUP [6] uses In Parameter Oreder Generation (IPOG) approach combined with Minimum Invalid Tuples (MIT) for testing suite generation. Although these strategies are able to generate test suit, but are not well optimized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sl, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S8, S9 SIO, Sll, S12, S13, S14, S15, S16, S17, S18, S19, S20, S21,S22,S23,S24,S25,S26,S27,S28,S29,S30,S31,S32,S33,S34,S35,S36,S37,S38,S39,S40,S41,S42,S43,S44,S45,S46 How Sl, S3, S7, S9, S13, S14, S18, S22, S31, S45, S47 technique was GE (GEneric) with 6 publications, followed by SA (Simulated Annealing), GA (Genetic Algorithm), EA (Evolutionary Algorithm), MOEA (Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm) and STA (Static Analysis). The remaining references were spread out among the remaining 5 techniques.…”
Section: Whatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The t-way test suite generation (where t indicates the interaction strength), involves finding an optimized set of test cases that covers the t-way interaction strength. Many reported test results indicate that t-way test suite is as good as exhaustive testing [8,9]. Over the last 10 years, many new meta-heuristic algorithms have been developed, often, disguised by some new inspirations and mathematical formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%