2021
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-3677
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Analysis of Concordance between Liquid and Tumor Tissue Biopsies for RAS Mutations in Colorectal Cancer with a Single Metastasis Site: The METABEAM Study

Abstract: Background: OncoBEAM TM is a circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) test that uses the BEAMing digital polymerase chain reaction technology. We clarified the association between the baseline tumor burden and discordance in the RAS status by metastatic sites in patients with a single metastatic site.Patients and methods: Data from previous Spanish and Japanese studies investigating the concordance of the RAS status between OncoBEAM TM and tissue biopsy in 221 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) were used. … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
47
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
47
1
Order By: Relevance
“…TriMeth was particularly sensitive towards patients with liver recurrence (100%), while it was less sensitive towards lung recurrences (76.5%) (P Z 0.0432). The observations are consistent with other ctDNA studies [33,34] and may be related to the high radiographic resolution in the lungs, i.e. lung lesions can be detected while very small, and potentially too small in some cases to shed enough tumour DNA for detection by ctDNA analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…TriMeth was particularly sensitive towards patients with liver recurrence (100%), while it was less sensitive towards lung recurrences (76.5%) (P Z 0.0432). The observations are consistent with other ctDNA studies [33,34] and may be related to the high radiographic resolution in the lungs, i.e. lung lesions can be detected while very small, and potentially too small in some cases to shed enough tumour DNA for detection by ctDNA analysis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…21,22 Another possibility that may cause the above discordant status between the ctDNA and CEA levels is the intrinsic biological characteristics between metastatic sites. [23][24][25] A significant association was observed between the ctDNA level and liver metastasis, whereas no association was observed in patients without liver metastasis. Similarly, Vidal et al reported that the site of peritoneal and lung metastases and the mucinous histology of the tumor negatively affect the detection of ctDNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Thus, plasma-based MSI assessment may be less likely to detect MSI-H in patients with tumor characteristics, which likely results in a low ctDNA fraction, such as low tumor burden, no liver metastasis, isolated lung metastases, and specific cancer types (eg, primary brain tumors and renal cell carcinoma). [20][21][22][23][24][25] Conversely, some patients had tissue-negative but ctDNApositive MSI-H tumors. The NGS-based MSI assessment supposedly has higher performance in the evaluation of MSI status in non-CRCs compared with PCR-based testing developed primarily for CRC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, plasma-based MSI assessment may be less likely to detect MSI-H in patients with tumor characteristics, which likely results in a low ctDNA fraction, such as low tumor burden, no liver metastasis, isolated lung metastases, and specific cancer types (eg, primary brain tumors and renal cell carcinoma). 20 - 25 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%