69th EAGE Conference and Exhibition Incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2007 2007
DOI: 10.3997/2214-4609.201401811
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Analysis of Electrical Resistivity and Geotechnical SPT Blow Counts for the Safety Assessment of Fill Dam

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the fully saturated case, the water level may be approximately delineated with an inverted result, showing a drastic change in the resistivity pattern around a depth of 10-15 m (similar to the true value at 10 m). In accordance with previous electrical surveys of embankments (Oh and Sun 2008), the saturated cases seem to be more realistic and show low resistivity values around the lower portions of a resistivity section. However, it is very difficult to predict the resistivity values of the upstream materials.…”
Section: Effects Of Reservoir Statussupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In the fully saturated case, the water level may be approximately delineated with an inverted result, showing a drastic change in the resistivity pattern around a depth of 10-15 m (similar to the true value at 10 m). In accordance with previous electrical surveys of embankments (Oh and Sun 2008), the saturated cases seem to be more realistic and show low resistivity values around the lower portions of a resistivity section. However, it is very difficult to predict the resistivity values of the upstream materials.…”
Section: Effects Of Reservoir Statussupporting
confidence: 87%
“…If there is any weak zone in the core of the embankment material as a result of piping or internal erosion, such zones will have a higher resistivity [23]. The resistivity variation within an embankment can be compared with the values reported here, and thus this study can help to address any safety concern in the embankment.…”
Section: Correction To Experimental Valuesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Therefore, this study used only V S determined by crosshole and downhole tests of the weathered layer in Hongseong to determine the correlations between V S and N values. For blow counts above 50 (e.g., 50/25 or 50/6) in the layers of weathered soil and weathered rock, N values were extrapolated linearly to a penetration depth of 30 cm to analyze the regression between V S and N values (Oh and Sun 2008;Sun et al 2013). The absolute meaning of N values measured in the field may differ between tests owing to differences such as the type of hammer, the method of using the hammer, borehole diameter, ground conditions, rod length, difference in working capability, and effective overburden pressure (Aggour and Radding 2001).…”
Section: Relationship Between Shear Wave Velocity and N Value In The mentioning
confidence: 99%