2001
DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.103.23.2845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Angiotensin II Receptor Antagonism and Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibition Further Attenuates Postinfarction Left Ventricular Remodeling

Abstract: Background-ACE inhibition (ACEI) attenuates post-myocardial infarction (MI) LV remodeling, but the effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT 1 ) antagonism alone or in combination with ACEI are unclear. Accordingly, we investigated the effects of AT 1 antagonism, ACEI, and their combination in a well-characterized ovine postinfarction model. Methods and Results-Beginning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous experimental and clinical studies reported additional benefits of the combination therapy in systolic heart failure as compared with the monotherapy with ACEI. 9,[25][26][27] The current study expanded those previous studies by demonstrating that this concept can be applied to DHF as well as systolic heart failure. Kim et al showed that the combination achieved more preventive benefits than a monotherapy in the same hypertensive DHF model when the medications were initiated before the appearance of hypertension, ventricular structural abnormalities, and diastolic dysfunction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…Previous experimental and clinical studies reported additional benefits of the combination therapy in systolic heart failure as compared with the monotherapy with ACEI. 9,[25][26][27] The current study expanded those previous studies by demonstrating that this concept can be applied to DHF as well as systolic heart failure. Kim et al showed that the combination achieved more preventive benefits than a monotherapy in the same hypertensive DHF model when the medications were initiated before the appearance of hypertension, ventricular structural abnormalities, and diastolic dysfunction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 65%
“…22 By contrast, other studies report that ACE inhibition and AT 1 receptor antagonism provide similar improvement of endothelial dysfunction. 7,21,23 Our results suggest that ACE inhibition may offer greater benefits, because ACEi lower tissue Ang II levels and increase tissue bradykinin levels, which causes NO to increase, whereas AT 1 receptor antagonists may only block the AT 1 receptor. However, whether it is more beneficial to use both ACEi and AT 1 receptor antagonists than either inhibitor alone still awaits the outcome of several ongoing clinical trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…In hemodialysis patients, one retrospective study demonstrated a 52% reduction in mortality risk in unselected patients who were treated with ACEI, which was independent of antihypertensive effects (9). ACEI have pleiotropic cardiovascular effects, including reducing myocyte response to the intracardiac renin-angiotensin system (34), attenuating ventricular remodeling (35), and limiting sympathetic nervous activity (36). We speculate that these responses explain why ACEI/ARB therapy at the time of the CA was associated with a beneficial survival response in this study.…”
Section: Factors That Influence Survival After Camentioning
confidence: 99%