2003
DOI: 10.1385/abab:109:1-3:253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Biologic (Anaerobic-Aerobic) and Chemical Treatment of Starch Industry Wastewater

Abstract: A combined biologic and chemical treatment of high-strength (total chemical oxygen demand [CODtoJ up to 20 g/L), strong nitrogenous (totalNup to 1 g/L), and phosphoric (total P up to 0.4 g/L) starch industry wastewater was investigated at laboratory-scale level. As a principal step for COD elimination, upflow anaerobic sludge bed reactor performance was investigated at 30°C. Under hydraulic retention times (HRTs) of about 1 d, when the organic loading rates were higher than 15 g of COD / (L.d), the CODtot remo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These compounds are very toxic at concentrations higher than 2 mg/L and also have a high oxygen demand (2.4 mg/mg phenol), giving rise to a considerable decrease in oxygen concentration and problems for aquatic life. Several treatment methods are possible, including some that attempt to recover the phenol for reuse, incineration, sorption [1], biologic treatment [2] and chemical oxidation [3]. The method selected will depend essentially on pollutant concentration and other strategic and financial aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These compounds are very toxic at concentrations higher than 2 mg/L and also have a high oxygen demand (2.4 mg/mg phenol), giving rise to a considerable decrease in oxygen concentration and problems for aquatic life. Several treatment methods are possible, including some that attempt to recover the phenol for reuse, incineration, sorption [1], biologic treatment [2] and chemical oxidation [3]. The method selected will depend essentially on pollutant concentration and other strategic and financial aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Operating temperatures of 30±1 and 10±1 o C were maintained by placing the corresponding reactor into thermostat "TS-80" (Mashzavod, Odessa, USSR) or refrigerator "Snaige" (Alitus, Lithuania), respectively. Reactor M (mesophilic) was seeded with mesophilic sludge (40 g VSS, specific aceticlastic activity -0.67 g COD/g VSS/d at 30 o C) originating from an UASB reactor treating starch industry wastewater (Sklyar et al, 2002). Reactor P (psychrophilic) was seeded with psychrophilic sludge (12.2 g VSS, specific aceticlastic activity -0.12 g COD/g VSS/d at 10 o C) originating from an UASB reactor treating winery wastewater (Kalyuzhnyi et al, 2001).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the treatment of textile wastewater by using an UASB reactor allowed to achieve COD removal efficiency of 9% to 51% [31]. The treatment of starch wastewater resulted in a reduction of COD in the range of 77% to 93% [32]. Other studies examined the effects of OLRs (0.82 and 6.11 g COD/L•d) and HRT ranging from 4.1 d to 1.7 d on UASB reactor performance using wastewater with a COD concentration of 10 g/L [33].…”
Section: Organic Compounds and Nutrient Removalmentioning
confidence: 99%