“…At the range of 11~13 compression rates, the mean of PRD of the proposed method is 2.49, which is significantly lower than the other methods, i.e. 3.8, 3.51, 3.73, and 3.57, proposed by [19], [20], [21], and [3], respectively. The same fact occurred at the range of 14~16 compression rates, the mean of PRD of the proposed method is 2.82, while the other methods generate higher distortion, i.e.…”