Proceedings of the 1997 American Control Conference (Cat. No.97CH36041) 1997
DOI: 10.1109/acc.1997.610610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined command shaping and inertial damping for flexure control

Abstract: This paper describes a new control approach that combines command shaping and inertial damping to control small robots that are attached to the end of a flexible manipulator. The command shaping guarantees that the level of vibration will be minimized during the robot motion and the inertial damping removes any residual effects after the motion is complete. Experimental results from two different test beds verifY the effectiveness of the combined approach for minimizing vibration in elastic systems.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Control strategies, which try to avoid base vibrations by appropriate planning of the manipulator trajectory can be categorized as input shaping methods [8], [9]. However, for systems with unknown disturbances or with an initial excitation these kinds of strategies are insufficient [10]. In order to additionally suppress the vibrations once they occur it was proposed to combine input shaping methods with vibration suppression controllers [3], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Control strategies, which try to avoid base vibrations by appropriate planning of the manipulator trajectory can be categorized as input shaping methods [8], [9]. However, for systems with unknown disturbances or with an initial excitation these kinds of strategies are insufficient [10]. In order to additionally suppress the vibrations once they occur it was proposed to combine input shaping methods with vibration suppression controllers [3], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for systems with unknown disturbances or with an initial excitation these kinds of strategies are insufficient [10]. In order to additionally suppress the vibrations once they occur it was proposed to combine input shaping methods with vibration suppression controllers [3], [10]. The control design and stability considerations are often based on singular perturbation theory [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To avoid the design of a single concurrent controller, the rigid links and the flexible links are regulated by independent controllers assuming that their dynamics are separated in time scales. This method has been applied by many researchers [14,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29] and proven effective in experimental studies. In particular, various tests were performed by Book and his colleagues at Georgia Tech [26][27][28][29] using the test bed located in the Intelligent Machine Dynamics Laboratory (IMDL), in which a micromanipulator, SAMII (Small Articulated Manipulator II), is mounted at the tip of a cantilevered beam fixed to the ceiling, the base motion of which is similar to that at the tip of a flexible manipulator with locked joints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…References [7,8] provide a survey for both feedforward and feedback controllers. Approaches that combine input shaping with feedback controllers have also been proposed in [13][14][15][16], in which shaped commands are tracked by feedback controllers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active mass damping has been shown to be an effective method for reducing vibrations in flexible robots by previous researchers working on an experimental test bed at Georgia Tech [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. The experimental test bed is shown in Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%