2011
DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2011.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomography and 18-Fluoro-2-Deoxy-d-Glucose-Positron Emission Tomography in the Diagnosis and Staging of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…35 Finally, it could be argued that our analysis would inherently favor the SUV ratio over SUV max simply because a variety of scanners at different imaging centers were included in this study, and the performance of SUV max is disproportionately affected by the scanner hardware and reconstruction approaches. Indeed, it has been shown that while absolute SUV measurements can vary by 15-20% between centers, [11][12][13][14]36 the SUV ratio is relatively insensitive to the PET protocol used. [24][25] This is actually one of the main advantages to using an SUV ratio, as considerable variation in PET/CT methodology is common in both the United States and internationally even among academic medical centers.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…35 Finally, it could be argued that our analysis would inherently favor the SUV ratio over SUV max simply because a variety of scanners at different imaging centers were included in this study, and the performance of SUV max is disproportionately affected by the scanner hardware and reconstruction approaches. Indeed, it has been shown that while absolute SUV measurements can vary by 15-20% between centers, [11][12][13][14]36 the SUV ratio is relatively insensitive to the PET protocol used. [24][25] This is actually one of the main advantages to using an SUV ratio, as considerable variation in PET/CT methodology is common in both the United States and internationally even among academic medical centers.…”
Section: A C C E P T E D Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, while SUV is standardized for a patient's weight and the amount of FDG administered, it does not take into account a plethora of other patient, tumor, and technique-specific factors, which contribute to a measured variability in the absolute SUV on the order of 10-20%. [11][12][13][14] Patient-specific factors that affect tumor uptake include body composition and habitus, plasma glucose level, and respiratory rate. Techniquespecific factors include the time from tracer injection to scanning, interscanner variability, reconstruction parameter changes, use of contrast, and interobserver variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A diagnostic effectiveness of PET/CT for staging NSCLC and superiority to conventional cancer imaging modalities has been demonstrated by many studies [18, 20, 50, 51]. However, whether this technology should be widely applied in the staging of NSCLC remains at debate for its high examination costs.…”
Section: The Cost-effectiveness Of Pet/ct In Nsclc Stagingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28] The reasons for this wide range included the study of different patient populations, varying criteria for malignancy, and patient-, tumor-, and technique-specific factors. [9,10] …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%