2011 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting 2011
DOI: 10.1109/pes.2011.6039463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined cycle resource scheduling in ERCOT nodal market

Abstract: ERCOT has moved from a zonal market to an advanced nodal market since December 2010. In ERCOT, combined cycle trains (CCT) contribute a significant share of its total installed capacity. Therefore, how to accurately and efficiently model the CCT is one of the key factors for a successful EROCT nodal market. In order to facilitate market operations and ensure the system reliability, the ERCOT nodal market supports the modeling of CCT in two different ways: configuration-based modeling and physical unit modeling… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, some of the wholesale electricity markets in North America are interested in implementing more sophisticated combined-cycle modeling [6] [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, some of the wholesale electricity markets in North America are interested in implementing more sophisticated combined-cycle modeling [6] [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CM 2 to CM 7 can be formulated in a similar manner. Because v 1 , v 2 , v 3 , 1v 1 , 1v 2 , and 1v 3 are binary variables of the components' status, CM 1 to CM 7 are bounded by the linear constraints in (2). For example, CM 1 is bounded by the following constraints:…”
Section: Mapping Of Component Status To Configuration Modementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is challenging to model the operational flexibility of CCGTs in the UC problem because the scheduling of CCGT units needs to decide the on/off status and power output of each CT and ST unit at every time interval. In practice, independent system operators (ISOs) use three typical methods to model CCGTs [2][3][4]: the aggregated modeling approach, in which the whole CCGT unit is modeled as a pseudo-thermal unit, ignoring all different operating configurations; the configuration-based approach, in which each commitment combination of CTs and STs is a particular configuration; and the component-based approach, in which each individual CT and ST unit is modeled separately. The dependency among CTs and STs is represented by a group of MW-steam constraints for CTs and steam-MW constraints for STs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of multi-energy systems, there has been a lot of research interest in developing optimal scheduling models for CCPPs. Reference [8] summarizes the various modelling approaches which have been used to model CCPPs by independent system operators (ISOs) such as ERCOT, PJM, NYISO and others. Among the approaches listed in [8], the physical unit modelling (component-based modelling) approach has been used by several researchers [7], [9], [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%