Volume 1 2004
DOI: 10.1115/esda2004-58542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Deterministic-Stochastic Frequency-Domain Subspace Identification for Experimental and Operational Modal Analysis

Abstract: Until recently frequency-domain subspace algorithms were limited to identify deterministic models from input/output measurements. In this paper, a combined deterministic-stochastic frequency-domain subspace algorithm is presented to estimate models from input/output spectra, frequency response functions or power spectra for application as experimental and operational modal analysis. The relation with time-domain subspace identification is elaborated. It is shown by both simulations and real-life test examples … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
84
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
84
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The fitting of experimental data to a model is an optimization problem based on a cost function, which can be solved either through the linear least squares method or with the maximum likelihood (ML) estimator [17]. All the possible combinations of the previously referred models and fitting procedures are explored in [13], together with a different class of methods (realization algorithms) that use frequency domain state-space models, designated stochastic frequency-domain subspace identification methods. In [18], it is introduced an alternative frequency domain identification algorithm based on the concept of transmissibility functions.…”
Section: Overview Of Oma Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The fitting of experimental data to a model is an optimization problem based on a cost function, which can be solved either through the linear least squares method or with the maximum likelihood (ML) estimator [17]. All the possible combinations of the previously referred models and fitting procedures are explored in [13], together with a different class of methods (realization algorithms) that use frequency domain state-space models, designated stochastic frequency-domain subspace identification methods. In [18], it is introduced an alternative frequency domain identification algorithm based on the concept of transmissibility functions.…”
Section: Overview Of Oma Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This disadvantage can be avoided by the use of the so-called positive or half-spectrum. It is demonstrated, for instance in [13], that the modal decomposition of the half-spectrum is given by…”
Section: S Yy ðOþ ¼ Hðoþr Uu H H ðOþ ð17þmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ao substituir a PSD do ruído branco na Eq. (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20) onde δ(t) é a função delta de Dirac. Pelo do teorema de Parseval [32], não é possível obter uma realização de um ruído branco propriamente dito.…”
Section: Hipótese De Forçamento Por Ruído Brancounclassified
“…Coso o contrário, são relacionados ao filtro de forçamento. Ao ser comparada com a análise modal experimental (EMA) [20], onde a identificação é feita através do sinais de força e resposta, a análise modal operacional contém vantagens e desvantagens. As principais vantagens estão relacionadas à identificação de estruturas que não podem ser trazidas para laboratórios, como por exemplo, prédios, pontes, turbinas eólicas, satélites em orbita, etc.…”
Section: Análise Modal Operacionalunclassified