Restaging of prostate cancer in patients with biochemical recurrence after radical treatment remains a challenging clinical scenario as current imaging modalities are suboptimal. To date, prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography seems to represent a very promising diagnostic tool in this setting. Therefore, we evaluated the detection rate of several positron emission tomography/computerized tomography prostate specific membrane antigen based tracers in the restaging of prostate cancer in patients with biochemical recurrence. Materials and Methods: According to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) statement, a systematic search was performed across MEDLINEÒ, EmbaseÒ and Web of ScienceÔ. PICOS (Patient, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, Study Type), criteria consisted of P: patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and/or radiation therapy as primary treatment; I: studies using gallium-68Àprostate specific membrane antigen-11, gallium-68Àprostate specific membrane antigen inhibitor for imaging and therapy, gallium-68ÀtrishydroxypyridinoneÀprostate specific membrane antigen, copper-64Àprostate specific membrane antigen-617, fluorine-18ÀDCFPyL or fluorine-18Àprostate specific membrane antigen-1007; C: no control group or positron emission tomography/computerized tomography comparative studies; O: patient specific overall detection rate; and S: retrospective/prospective studies. A meta-analysis of proportions and a network meta-analysis were performed. Heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran Q and I 2 statistics. Quality was assessed by QUADAS-2 (University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom). Funnel plots and Egger test were used for publication biases. Results: A total of 43 studies including 5,832 patients were identified and included in the analysis. An overall detection rate of 74.1% (95% CI 69.2%e78.5%) was found, with no differences between tracers. The overall detection rates were