Combined Effect of Matrix Topography and Stiffness on Neutrophil Shape and Motility

Abstract

The crawling behavior of leukocytes is driven by the cell morphology transition, which is a direct manifestation of molecular motor machinery. The topographical anisotropy and mechanical stiffness of the substrates are the main physical cues that affect leukocytes’ shape generation and migratory responses. However, their combined effects on the cell morphology and motility have been poorly understood, particularly for neutrophils, which are the fastest reacting leukocytes against infections and wounds. Here, spatiotemporally correlated physical parameters are shown, which determine the neutrophil shape change during migratory processes, in response to surface topography and elasticity. Guided crawling and shape generation of individual neutrophils, activated by a uniform concentration of a chemoattractant, are analyzed by adopting elasticity‐tunable micropatterning and live cell imaging techniques. Whole cell‐level image analysis is performed based on a planar geometric quantification of cell shape and motility. The findings show that the pattern anisotropy and elastic modulus of the substrate induce synergic effects on the shape anisotropy, deformability, and polarization/alignment of crawling neutrophils. How the morphology–motility relationship is affected by different surface microstructures and stiffness is demonstrated. These results imply that the neutrophil shape‐motility correlations can be utilized for controlling the immune cell functions with predefined physical microenvironments.

The Combined Effects of Topography and Stiffness on Neuronal Differentiation and Maturation Using a Hydrogel Platform

“…While stiffness and topography have been investigated extensively with regards to neuronal behavior, they have rarely been studied in combination. Previous works have studied the influence of both topography and stiffness on cell shape and identity [ 33 , 34 , 35 ], emphasizing the synergistic effect of multiple biophysical parameters. However, the interaction between topography and stiffness effects have not been considered with regards to neuronal differentiation.…”