2005
DOI: 10.1071/mf04272
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined effects of acidification and competition on the feeding preference of a freshwater macroinvertebrate, Asellus aquaticus (Crustacea:Isopoda): a laboratory experiment

Abstract: To determine the combined effects of stream acidification and competition on the feeding preferences of benthic detritivores we compared, before and after sublethal acid exposure, lab-cultured populations of Asellus aquaticus reared either singly or with the closely related species Proasellus coxalis sensu lato in artificial channels. Both abiotic and biotic stressors reduced A. aquaticus density and affected its food intake. Whereas the presence of P. coxalis sensu lato increased the mass-specific ingestion r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combined effects of flood and river basin urbanisation and the observed difference in the recovery capacity of the two communities may be explained with reference to the assumptions of OFT and the MTE, which predict that decreased food availability and quality and increased metabolic costs due to disturbance can promote trophic generalism (e.g. Costantini et al. , 2005) and intraguild predation (Hastings & Conrad, 1979; Křivan, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The combined effects of flood and river basin urbanisation and the observed difference in the recovery capacity of the two communities may be explained with reference to the assumptions of OFT and the MTE, which predict that decreased food availability and quality and increased metabolic costs due to disturbance can promote trophic generalism (e.g. Costantini et al. , 2005) and intraguild predation (Hastings & Conrad, 1979; Křivan, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correlations between predator and prey abundances were taken into account only when the difference between their δ 15 N values fell within 1–4‰ (Post, 2002; Fry, 2006), a predator‐prey link being assigned when consistent with the non‐zero output of the mixing model. As detritivores colonise fungal‐conditioned litter on the basis of its differing palatability (Rossi, 1985; Graça, Maltby & Calow, 1993; Costantini & Rossi, 1995; Costantini et al. , 2005), detritivore‐detritus links were determined for each taxon based on the proportion of litter bags colonised, the bags being considered as spatially separated resource patches with different fungal biomasses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given the site-scale characterising our experiment, further experiments considering the potential variability of the observed top-down and bottom-up controls across different spatial scales [70] will allow to understand if the observed effect of predators and resources quality on P recycling by prey is consistent at broader geographical scales. In addition, the trophic interactions in such detritus-based systems have been shown to be sensitive to water pollution and acidification during laboratory experiments [26], [71], [72]. This posits the comprehension of top-down and bottom-up combined effect on P recycling in lotic systems as a key step to understand how perturbation of species interactions could rebound at ecosystem level [30], [73], [74], [75].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exactly how this works, however, often remains obscure. While some detritivore species seem to facilitate each other or interact synergistically (Hedde et al., 2010; Zimmer et al., 2005), others compete for high‐quality food sources (Costantini et al., 2005; Chang et al, 2016) or exert top‐down effects on one another through predation (Ewers et al., 2012). In all these cases, however, their interactions may depend on the quality of their detrital resources.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%