1994
DOI: 10.1006/jfan.1994.1078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Effects of Concave and Convex Nonlinearities in Some Elliptic Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

23
820
1
9

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,004 publications
(891 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
23
820
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…x ∈ Ω (α, β > 0), and set for all (x, t) ∈ Ω × R f (x, t) = −a(x)t + b(x)|t| p−2 t. Then, f satisfies hypotheses H 2 with convenient a 0 , c 0 , and σ. This choice of f belongs in the class of concave-convex nonlinearities, whose study (in the classical case s = 1) started with [1].…”
Section: The Superlinear Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…x ∈ Ω (α, β > 0), and set for all (x, t) ∈ Ω × R f (x, t) = −a(x)t + b(x)|t| p−2 t. Then, f satisfies hypotheses H 2 with convenient a 0 , c 0 , and σ. This choice of f belongs in the class of concave-convex nonlinearities, whose study (in the classical case s = 1) started with [1].…”
Section: The Superlinear Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now we prove that ϕ + is unbounded from below. Indeed, letû 1 be defined as in Proposition 2.8 (i), and recall that û 1 …”
Section: By (42) and The Continuous Embeddings Hmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nonlinearity considered here is concave-convex. The simultaneous effect of the concave and convex terms has been initially investigated by Ambrosetti et al [1] in the Euclidian case for the Laplace operator. Since then, elliptic problems with this kind of nonlinearities were extensively studied by several authors with different classes of domains and with more general differential operators like the p-Laplacian.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When 1 < m < 2 (q < 1 < p) and a(x) ≡ a 0 with a 0 a positive constant, (1.4) was studied in [4] in the particular case L = −∆ and in [6] when L is a quasilinear operator. When a changes sign, (1.4) was analyzed in [24] in the particular case λ ≤ 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%