2010
DOI: 10.1097/aud.0b013e3181d3d514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Effects of Noise and Reverberation on Speech Recognition Performance of Normal-Hearing Children and Adults

Abstract: Results highlight changes in speech recognition performance with age in elementary school children listening to speech in noisy, reverberant classrooms. The more reverberant the environment, the better the SNR required. The younger the child, the better the SNR required. Results support the importance of attention to classroom acoustics and emphasize the need for maximizing SNR in classrooms, especially in classrooms designed for early childhood grades.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

16
159
4
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
16
159
4
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The reverberant stimuli were generated by convolving recorded room impulse responses (RIR) obtained experimentally in three different rooms. For reverberation time (RT) values of 0.3 s, 0.6 s and 0.8 s, RIRs were obtained on a rectangular reverberant room (length 10.06 m, width 6.65 m, height 3.4 m) which had its reverberation characteristics varied by hanging absorptive panels on the walls [16]. For RT = 1.0 s, a RIR obtained on a 5.5 m ⇥ 4.5 m ⇥ 3.1 m room was used [17].…”
Section: Speech Intelligibility Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reverberant stimuli were generated by convolving recorded room impulse responses (RIR) obtained experimentally in three different rooms. For reverberation time (RT) values of 0.3 s, 0.6 s and 0.8 s, RIRs were obtained on a rectangular reverberant room (length 10.06 m, width 6.65 m, height 3.4 m) which had its reverberation characteristics varied by hanging absorptive panels on the walls [16]. For RT = 1.0 s, a RIR obtained on a 5.5 m ⇥ 4.5 m ⇥ 3.1 m room was used [17].…”
Section: Speech Intelligibility Databasementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reverberant stimuli are generated by convolving the clean signals with real RIRs recorded in a 10.06 m  6.65 m  3.4 m (length  width  height) room (Neuman et al, 2010). The reverberation time of the room is varied from 0.8 to 0.6, and 0.3 s by adding absorptive panels to the walls and floor carpeting.…”
Section: Simulated Reverberant Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary goal of a speech intelligibility test is generally to measure the speech-reception threshold (SRT / ), i.e., the SNR at which a particular fraction, /, of words are correctly identified (Plomp and Mimpen, 1979;Wilson et al, 2007). It is also, however, often important to measure the slope of the PF at the SRT (MacPherson and Akeroyd, 2014;Neuman et al, 2010) and it is this that determines the perceptual benefit that can be obtained by improving the SNR. This paper presents an adaptive procedure for measuring both the SRT and the slope of the PF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%