1999
DOI: 10.1128/aem.65.11.4921-4925.1999
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Effects of pH and Sugar on Growth Rate of Zygosaccharomyces rouxii , a Bakery Product Spoilage Yeast

Abstract: The effects of citric acid-modified pH (pH 2.5, 2.75, 3, 3.5, 4, 4.5, 5, and 5.5) and a 30% glucose–70% sucrose mixture (300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, 875, and 900 g/liter) on an osmophilic yeast,Zygosaccharomyces rouxii, were determined by using synthetic medium. One hundred experiments were carried out; 50-ml culture flasks were inoculated with 103 CFU ml−1 by using a collection strain and a wild-type strain cocktail. The biomass was measured by counting cell colonies, and growth curves were fitted by using … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
25
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Between‐host differences in host quality may stem from variation in any of the nectar parameters considered here, as pH, sugar concentration, and sugar composition are all known to affect yeast growth (e.g. Membré et al ., ; Peay et al ., ; Pozo et al ., ). When cultured in single‐sugar artificial media, M. reukaufii growth declines with increasing sugar concentration, and also in the direction sucrose–glucose–fructose (Herrera et al ., ), which supports the interpretation that nectar sugar differences account, at least in part, for between‐host variation in growth found in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between‐host differences in host quality may stem from variation in any of the nectar parameters considered here, as pH, sugar concentration, and sugar composition are all known to affect yeast growth (e.g. Membré et al ., ; Peay et al ., ; Pozo et al ., ). When cultured in single‐sugar artificial media, M. reukaufii growth declines with increasing sugar concentration, and also in the direction sucrose–glucose–fructose (Herrera et al ., ), which supports the interpretation that nectar sugar differences account, at least in part, for between‐host variation in growth found in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). This model has been successfully used to ®t growth of foodborne bacteria (Membre  et al 1999a), yeast (Membre  et al 1999b), or fungi such as Penicillium roqueforti (Valik et al 1999) and Aspergillus¯avus (Gibson et al 1994). The growth rate, m, estimated by a modelling step, is equivalent to the slope of the straight line observed on the plot.…”
Section: Growth Curve Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yeast and moulds are found in a wide range of environments due to their capacity to utilize a variety of substrates and to their relative tolerance of low pH, low water activity and low temperature (Huis in't Veld 1996). A few studies concerning yeast or mould colonization have dealt with the predictive modelling approach (Cuppers et al 1997;Membre  et al 1999b). The primary model developed by Baranyi has been successfully adapted to ®t colony diameter growth curves of Penicillium roqueforti (Valik et al 1999) and Aspergillus¯avus (Gibson et al 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When bread is cut, the inner, more susceptible surface is exposed to mould infection. The bakery product's water activity (a w ) is the most important factor affecting the type and rate of spoilage (Membré et al, 1999). Commercially produced and properly handled bread generally lacks sufficient amounts of moisture to allow growth of any micro-organisms except moulds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%