Combined endodontic and periodontal management of a class 3 invasive cervical resorption in a mandibular first molar

Nagahara, Takayoshi; Takeda, Katsuhiro; Aida, Yusuke; Iwata, Takeo; Yagi, Ryoichi; Kurihara, Hidemi; Shiba, Hideki

doi:10.1002/ccr3.1785

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 27 publications

(49 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In the reports, the H classification system was used more frequently to describe the lesions, probably as a consequence of the initial lack of CBCT technology. When the P classification was used, it was, in the majority of the cases, described in conjunction with the H system [39][40][41]; only in two cases was the P classification used alone [42,43]. It is important to emphasise that 20 out of the 66 reports included did not describe the classification but, interestingly, in 23 cases/teeth the reviewers were able to assign one (H), based on the information available (Table 1).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical management of external cervical resorption: A systematic review

Bardini,

Orrù,

Ideo

et al. 2023

Aust Endodontic J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This review investigated whether any therapeutic options influenced the outcome of treatment for teeth with external cervical resorption. Out of 870 articles identified by an electronic search, 60 clinical case reports and six case series were included. No randomised clinical trials were found. Risk of bias was assessed using Joanna Briggs Institute's tools. External surgical intervention was the preferred method of accessing the lesions. Removal of resorptive tissue was most often achieved mechanically. Bioactive endodontic cements were the preferred materials for restoring teeth. The outcome measures were based on clinical and radiographic parameters. Of the cases included in the review, no specific treatment approach had a superior outcome in relation to Heithersay's classification. Furthermore, due to the absence of randomised clinical trials, and the low level of evidence associated with case reports/case series, it was not possible to define the optimum clinical treatment for external cervical resorption.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical management of external cervical resorption: A systematic review

Bardini,

Orrù,

Ideo

et al. 2023

Aust Endodontic J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For this purpose, the ECR will be excavated externally by raising a mucoperiosteal flap. Use of 90% aqueous solution of trichloroacetic acid (TCA) which induce coagulation necrosis on the resorption defect has been recommended [31]. On one hand, it inactivates clastic cells and may penetrate small resorptive defects [32,33].…”

Section: F I G U R Ementioning

confidence: 99%

Resistance to fracture of simulated external cervical resorption cavities repaired with different materials

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of the study was to evaluate the fracture resistance (FR) of teeth with simulated external cervical resorption (ECR) cavities repaired with different materials.Following the shaping of the 80 human permanent maxillary central incisors, standard ECR cavities were prepared and restored with a nanohybrid composite resin; a high viscosity GIC Equia Forte Fill; Biodentine; Biodentine + nanohybrid composite resin; MTA BIOREP; MTA BIOREP + nanohybrid composite resin. Then, the root canals were obturated with AH Plus and gutta-percha. The roots were embedded acrylic resin blocks and fracture strength test was applied. The highest FR was observed in the Biodentine group, while the lowest was in Equia group (p < 0.05). No significant results were observed among composite, Biodentine + composite, MTA BIOREP + composite and MTA BIOREP (p > 0.05). Biodentine may be a preferable material for repairing ECR cavities. Adding a composite layer on MTA BIOREP and Biodentine did not improve the FR of these materials.

show abstract

Combined endodontic and periodontal management of a class 3 invasive cervical resorption in a mandibular first molar

Cited by 2 publications

References 27 publications

Clinical management of external cervical resorption: A systematic review

Clinical management of external cervical resorption: A systematic review

Resistance to fracture of simulated external cervical resorption cavities repaired with different materials

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About