2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.02.117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Fenton oxidation and aerobic biological processes for treating a surfactant wastewater containing abundant sulfate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
24
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies evoke AOPs as pre-treatment combined to biological post-process [30]. The most studied AOPs are Fenton [31][32][33][34][35], photo-Fenton and solar-photo-Fenton treatments [36][37][38][39][40][41]. According to our knowledge only few studies have reported the possibility to combine a biological post-process to an EF treatment [42][43][44][45][46] and an AO treatment [43,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies evoke AOPs as pre-treatment combined to biological post-process [30]. The most studied AOPs are Fenton [31][32][33][34][35], photo-Fenton and solar-photo-Fenton treatments [36][37][38][39][40][41]. According to our knowledge only few studies have reported the possibility to combine a biological post-process to an EF treatment [42][43][44][45][46] and an AO treatment [43,[47][48][49][50][51][52][53].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chemical pre-treatment of wastewaters with the use of Fenton's reagent improved the effectiveness of organic compounds removal and increased wastewaters susceptibility to biodegradation. Coupling these methods enabled reaching 94% removal of organic compounds [14]. Moussavi et al also suggested the effi cient coupling of chemical and biological processes for the treatment of toxic wastewaters which, like in the reported study, were contaminated with formaldehyde.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The most common and least expensive method used for wastewater treatment is biological treatment (Burek 2008, Friha et al 2012), but also chemical methods are used. (Burek 2008, Wang et al 2008, de Melo et al 2013, Vlyssides et al 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These treatments must fulfi ll the discharge requirements with low investment and operating costs at the same time. Among analyzed solutions, such physicochemical and chemical methods were used: coagulation coupled with sedimentation (Aloui et al 2009, El-Gohary et al 2010, Perdigon-Melon et al 2010, Naumczyk et al 2013, Carpinteyro-Urban et al 2012, coagulation coupled with dissolved air fl otation (DAF) (El-Gohary et al 2010), electrocoagulation (Aloui et al 2009, (Boroski et al 2009), advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) (Wang et al 2008, Aloui et al 2009, Perdigon-Melon et al 2010, Boroski et al 2009, Bautista et al 2007, Bautista et al 2010a, Bautista et al 2010b, Carballa et al 2007, Marcinowski et al 2014, Ebraheim et al 2013). Advanced biological methods were also proposed: membrane reactors (Friha et al 2012, Friha et al 2104, Monsalvo et al 2014), mixed anaerobic-aerobic processes (Zhang et al 2013) or anaerobic reactors (Puyol et al 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%