2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.08.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined heat and mass transfer for laminar flow of moist air in a 3D rectangular duct: CFD simulation and validation with experimental data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pressure interpolation is second order. Since the Richardson number is well below one, buoyancy effects are negligible, as also mentioned by Talukdar et al [30]. Thereby, only forced convection is accounted for in the air-flow simulations, considering heat as a passive scalar, by which the flow field and thus also the CTCs are not strongly dependent on the thermal boundary conditions.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Pressure interpolation is second order. Since the Richardson number is well below one, buoyancy effects are negligible, as also mentioned by Talukdar et al [30]. Thereby, only forced convection is accounted for in the air-flow simulations, considering heat as a passive scalar, by which the flow field and thus also the CTCs are not strongly dependent on the thermal boundary conditions.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A dimensionless control parameter specifies the system, the Rayleigh number Ra. It provides a dimensionless measure of the thermal forcing, and a critical Rayleigh number Ra c indicates when this instability will occur (Talukdar et al 2008).…”
Section: Airflow Results and Daily Inversionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vapour density of the air stream is determined from the measured temperature and RH of the airstream while the vapour density at the surface is based on the measured water temperature and the saturated air assumption. Talukdar et al used the results of similar experiments for comparison with CFD simulations [43].…”
Section: Wind Tunnel Experiments -Convection Coefficient Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%