2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.solener.2015.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined heat loss analysis of solar parabolic dish – modified cavity receiver for superheated steam generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…connection with receiver geometries, dimensions and positions were investigated for different applications [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Amongst the literature [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], the most relevant have been chosen and will be discussed in the next paragraph.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…connection with receiver geometries, dimensions and positions were investigated for different applications [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. Amongst the literature [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], the most relevant have been chosen and will be discussed in the next paragraph.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their results showed that the losses of the cavity receiver are about 12% of the input energy to the aperture of the receiver and there is a small effect from the cavity geometry on the overall efficiency. Reddy et al [21] studied the effect of different factors such as the emissivity, inclination, insulation thickness and operating temperature on natural and forced convection and radiation heat losses of a modified hemispherical cavity receiver. Regarding the effect of the receiver inclination, they found that the minimum natural convection heat loss occurs when the open side of the receiver faces downwards, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They presented a Nusselt number for convection heat loss from the investigated cylindrical cavity receiver. Reddy et al [17] evaluated a dish concentrator using a modified cavity receiver using a numerical method. They predicted a Nusselt number for the combination of the convection and radiation heat losses from the investigated cavity receiver.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They showed accurate and computationally cost effective predictions for fin-and-tube local temperature distributions, based on calculated non-uniform wall-fluid heat transfer coefficients captured by using advanced flow pattern maps based on wall wetting conditions for different flow regimes [42]. The modeling efforts for solar-driven tubular cavity receivers and reactors have been extensively reported [16,[43][44][45][46][47]. Martinek et al [16,44] developed a 3D steady-state model for a multi-tubular solar reactor for steam gasification of carbon using a hybrid Monte Carlo/ Finite Volume method for radiative heat transfer and a single-phase fluid flow model with volume-averaged mixture properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach is the following: a 1D two-phase flow model for the in-tube two-phase flow is coupled to a 3D heat transfer model of the receiver cavity, providing a simplified but accurate and computationally efficient model. A similar approach has been used by Zapata et al [48], one of the view reported modeling studies for solar-driven steam generation [46,48,49]. They used a 3D multi-mode heat transfer receiver model, however, they solved only a homogenous two-phase 1D model inside the absorber tube utilizing empirical correlations to predict the heat transfer between the tube surface and the working fluid without resolving the circumferential variations in the heat transfer coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%