2002
DOI: 10.1080/713605312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined hormone replacement therapy and risk of breast cancer in a French cohort study of 3175 women

Abstract: The largest-to-date randomized trial (Women's Health Initiative) comparing the effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) and a placebo concluded that the continuous use of an oral combination of conjugated equine estrogens (CEE) and medroxy-progesterone acetate (MPA) increases the risk of breast cancer. This conclusion may not apply to women taking other estrogen and progestin formulations, as suggested by discrepancies in the findings of in vitro studies, epidemiological surveys and, mostly, in vivo studie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, several clinical trials found that, in hormone replacement therapy, the combination of estrogen with a progestin such as medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) increased the risk of breast cancer (15). Two cohort studies followed over mean durations of 7 and 9 years showed no increase in breast cancer risk when estrogen was combined with natural P4, but there was an additional risk when synthetic progestins were used (16,17). Further, MPA has differential effects on cell proliferation and growth inhibition in benign and malignant human breast epithelial cells (18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, several clinical trials found that, in hormone replacement therapy, the combination of estrogen with a progestin such as medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) increased the risk of breast cancer (15). Two cohort studies followed over mean durations of 7 and 9 years showed no increase in breast cancer risk when estrogen was combined with natural P4, but there was an additional risk when synthetic progestins were used (16,17). Further, MPA has differential effects on cell proliferation and growth inhibition in benign and malignant human breast epithelial cells (18).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is, therefore, possible that the effect of European HT regimens is different from what has been observed in American studies. In a French cohort study HT users mostly received a combination of a transdermal estradiol plus either progesterone or progesterone-derivated progestins other than MPA and these women did not have an increased risk of breast cancer [39]. Although no large variations were seen between the effects of specific estrogens or specific progestagens in relation to breast cancer in the Million Women Study [12], a recent study by Fournier et al [40] showed that breast cancer risk differed according to the type of progestogen that was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if this study raised the question of a potential role of the consequences of associated ovariectomy or the nature of the oestrogens used (potential protective role of conjugated equine oestrogens), most of the recent studies underline again the deleterious role of progestin. Indeed, a cohort study [74] and more recently the E3N INSERM study [75] showed no increased risk when HRT included natural progesterone, strikingly contrasting with an increased risk of breast cancer when oestrogen are associated with synthetic progestin having androgenic (19-nortestosterone) or anti-inflammatory (medroxyprogesterone acetate) properties.…”
Section: U N R E S O L V E D Q U E S T I O N S P R E S E N T a N D mentioning
confidence: 99%