2000
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.2000.6484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Immersed-Boundary Finite-Difference Methods for Three-Dimensional Complex Flow Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

12
1,164
0
8

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,557 publications
(1,216 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
12
1,164
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The above procedure is necessary to eliminate odd-even decoupling that usually occurs with non-staggered methods and which leads to large pressure variations in space. The second sub-step requires the solution of the pressure correction equation (9) which is solved with the constraint that the final velocity be divergence-free. This gives the following Poisson equation for the pressure correction (10) and a Neumann boundary condition imposed on this pressure correction at all boundaries.…”
Section: Governing Equations and Discretization Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The above procedure is necessary to eliminate odd-even decoupling that usually occurs with non-staggered methods and which leads to large pressure variations in space. The second sub-step requires the solution of the pressure correction equation (9) which is solved with the constraint that the final velocity be divergence-free. This gives the following Poisson equation for the pressure correction (10) and a Neumann boundary condition imposed on this pressure correction at all boundaries.…”
Section: Governing Equations and Discretization Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(24) is used as the velocity boundary condition in advancing the flow equations (Eqs. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] which ensures that at the end of the time-step, the boundary and flow velocities are compatible. The general framework described above can therefore be considered as EulerianLagrangian, wherein the immersed boundaries are explicitly tracked as surfaces in a Lagrangian mode, while the flow computations are performed on a fixed Eulerian grid.…”
Section: Boundarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The former methods are known as immersed boundary formulations and tend to smear a solid boundary across few grid nodes due to the discrete delta function formulation they employ to introduce the effect of the boundary on the equations of motion [2]. The latter class of methods, on the other hand, treats solid boundaries as sharp interfaces utilizing either Cartesian, cut-cell formulations [3,4] or hybrid Cartesian/Immersed Boundary (HCIB) approaches (see [5,6,1,7] among others)-the reader is referred to [8,9] for more detailed discussion of this class of methods. Regardless on whether a diffused or a sharp interface formulation is employed, however, all available non-boundary conforming methods solve the Navier-Stokes equations in a background coordinate-conforming mesh, such as a Cartesian (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the IB approach, the presence of a solid boundary is replaced by suitable forcing conditions modeling the effect of the body on the flow. The IB technique was originally developed for incompressible flows [1,2,3,4,5] using non-uniform Cartesian grids to take advantage of simple numerical algorithms. Two of the authors have contributed to the extension of the IB method to the preconditioned compressible Navier-Stokes (NS) equations in order to solve complex flows at any value of the Mach number [6], and equipped it with a local mesh refinement procedure to resolve boundary layers and regions with high flow gradients (e.g., shocks) [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%