2011
DOI: 10.1002/acr.20595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined impact of concomitant arthritis and back problems on health status: Results from a nationally representative health survey

Abstract: Objective. To investigate whether people who report both arthritis and back problems report poorer health outcomes than those who have either condition alone. Methods. We performed an analysis of the 2005 Canadian Community Health Survey (n ‫؍‬ 126,049, age >15 years). Respondents were asked about long-term chronic health conditions diagnosed by a health professional and lasting 6 months or more. The risks of reporting 4 health outcomes (activity limitation, fair/poor self-rated overall health, fair/poor self-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings extend previous analyses which showed that the combination of back problems and arthritis was more highly associated with pain and activity limitation and having poor self-rated heath than either condition alone, even after controlling for the effect of other chronic health conditions [29]. It is likely that these higher levels of pain and disability are contributory reasons for the increased risk for individuals with both back problems and arthritis of not being employed or being out of the labor force.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our findings extend previous analyses which showed that the combination of back problems and arthritis was more highly associated with pain and activity limitation and having poor self-rated heath than either condition alone, even after controlling for the effect of other chronic health conditions [29]. It is likely that these higher levels of pain and disability are contributory reasons for the increased risk for individuals with both back problems and arthritis of not being employed or being out of the labor force.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…While it is not clear what the back problems and arthritis group represents, the similarity to the arthritis only group in terms of risks of not being in the labor force as well as the profile of socio-demographic and lifestyle characteristics tentatively suggests that a portion of the back problems and arthritis group might represent a contribution from arthritis with spinal involvement, such as osteoarthritis [29,41]. The profile of characteristics of the back problems only group is similar to that for chronic non-specific low back pain [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A greater number of comorbid conditions and higher illness burden may lead to greater physical, emotional, psychological and social vulnerability that renders an older individual prone to suffering from restricting back pain. One study from Canada reported an increased risk of activity limitation, poorer self-rated overall and mental health, and higher health care use among individuals with concomitant back pain and arthritis compared with those having either condition alone (43). Future studies should evaluate the impact of multimorbidity and combinations of chronic conditions (including other sites of pain (44) and arthritis (18)) on outcomes in older persons with back pain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cross-sectional population-based studies have been widely used to determine prevalence and for diagnosis in health for both national [35][36][37][38][39] and international levels [40][41][42] . In the case of the surveys that address the issue of disability, the incorporation of the concepts advocated by the WHO, through the ICF, is crucial for the estimation of the prevalence of disabilities not to be impaired, and that the results are not biased.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%