1991
DOI: 10.1021/ma00009a050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined infrared and electron diffraction study of the polymorphism of native celluloses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
329
2
3

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 512 publications
(352 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
18
329
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of two different crystalline forms in native cellulose, I α and I β , was first demonstrated by Attala and VanderHart [30] from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments with cross polarization/magic angle spinning (CP-MAS). The existence of such forms was also confirmed by electron diffraction and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analyses performed on algal cellulose during the study of the polymorphism of native cellulose by Sugiyama et al [26]. Attala and VanderHart [30] proposed that most native celluloses are mixtures of cellulose I α and I β , solving a long time problem in the scientific community.…”
Section: Cellulosementioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existence of two different crystalline forms in native cellulose, I α and I β , was first demonstrated by Attala and VanderHart [30] from nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) experiments with cross polarization/magic angle spinning (CP-MAS). The existence of such forms was also confirmed by electron diffraction and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) analyses performed on algal cellulose during the study of the polymorphism of native cellulose by Sugiyama et al [26]. Attala and VanderHart [30] proposed that most native celluloses are mixtures of cellulose I α and I β , solving a long time problem in the scientific community.…”
Section: Cellulosementioning
confidence: 84%
“…These represent the two main polymorphs of cellulose. The current knowledge on the crystallography and biosynthesis of cellulose strongly suggests that the structure of cellulose is made up of parallel chains [25,26], whereas the crystalline structure of cellulose II is described as antiparallel [26][27][28]. Cellulose I is not the most stable form of cellulose.…”
Section: Cellulosementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These two crystalline phases of native cellulose were differentiated based on different hydrogen bonding patterns of inter-and intra-molecular bonding within cellulose molecules 37 . Cellulose I α phase is metastable form and converts to more stable I β phase by heat treatment or annealing at 260-280°C 19,20 . As illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Influence Of Oxidative Reaction On Chemical Composition Changesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Native cellulose fibrils orientation (cellulose I) is categorized into the I α and I β phases on the basis of the appearance of the OH stretching region of their infrared spectra 17,18 . It has been suggested that hydrogen bonding patterns within the crystalline domains partially caused the differences between these two phases of native cellulose I. Metastable crystalline cellulose I α form became allomorph cellulose I β after heat treatment at 260-280°C in alkali solution 19,20 . The present work aimed to investigate the influence of non-enzymatic oxidative reaction that mimics wood decay in nature on lignocellulose degradation or modification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result is consistent with the composition analysis and SEM observation. After pretreatment, the transmittance of bands, like 3,412 cm -1 (H-bonded O-H stretching) and 990 cm -1 (C-H deformation) have some increase because the content of these groups in substrate increased, reflecting the depolymerization of lignocellulose polymers and disruption of the crystalline structure [28][29].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%