2010
DOI: 10.1149/1.3485693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined IV and CV Analysis of Laser Annealed Carbon and Boron Implanted SiGe Epitaxial Layers

Abstract: SiGe epitaxial layers receiving sub-melt laser annealing after Carbon and Boron co-implantations are investigated. Their electrical properties have been evaluated in the reverse bias region of the IV and CV characteristics of SiGe/Si diode structures. Large dc leakage currents and frequency-dependent capacitance dispersions are observed. They are indicating the presence of electrically active defects in the studied devices. Combined IV and CV analysis suggests that the defectivity of the B-induced end-ofrange … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter is frequently employed to reduce the silicon interstitial-mediated transient enhanced diffusion of B, in order to better control the junction depth. A more in-depth study of the electrically active defects, combining highfrequency C-V and I-V junction characteristics leads to the conclusion that the laser annealing itself creates point defects in the junction depletion region (34). This is demonstrated by the result of Fig.…”
Section: Impact Of Post-epi Implantation and Annealmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The latter is frequently employed to reduce the silicon interstitial-mediated transient enhanced diffusion of B, in order to better control the junction depth. A more in-depth study of the electrically active defects, combining highfrequency C-V and I-V junction characteristics leads to the conclusion that the laser annealing itself creates point defects in the junction depletion region (34). This is demonstrated by the result of Fig.…”
Section: Impact Of Post-epi Implantation and Annealmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Split 1 did not receive and split 2 did receive a B implantation. The average values of 5 samples are plotted for the MSA case.For the case without laser anneal, two samples have been measured and their values are directly plotted on the graph (after Kobayashi et al[34]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%