2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-013-2056-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined linkage and association mapping of flowering time in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.)

Abstract: Association mapping and linkage mapping were used to identify quantitative trait loci (QTL) and/or causative mutations involved in the control of flowering time in cultivated sunflower Helianthus annuus. A panel of 384 inbred lines was phenotyped through testcrosses with two tester inbred lines across 15 location × year combinations. A recombinant inbred line (RIL) population comprising 273 lines was phenotyped both per se and through testcrosses with one or two testers in 16 location × year combinations. In t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
61
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
5
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rogers & Bernatchez ; Cadic et al . ; Berner et al . ), and we have previously referred to this methodology as ‘selection signature QTL’ (ssQTL), as each QTL is explicitly linked to a set of divergent loci between species/populations (Parsons & Albertson ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rogers & Bernatchez ; Cadic et al . ; Berner et al . ), and we have previously referred to this methodology as ‘selection signature QTL’ (ssQTL), as each QTL is explicitly linked to a set of divergent loci between species/populations (Parsons & Albertson ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Association mapping was based on a set of 65 534 SNP with MAF > 0.05. Similarly to our previous work (Cadic et al ), two association models were performed using EMMA (Kang et al ) based on the Yu et al model (2006). Both models included a correction for the genomic relatedness using the alike‐in‐state (AIS) kinship estimated with EMMA version v1.1.2 R package (Villanova et al ) using all the previously mentioned SNPs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used CarthaGène v1.3 [34] to build the genetic maps. We added the genotypic data of markers from a consensus map [35] to the set of the 2164 SNPs to assign them to the appropriate LG to the group 0.3 8 in CarthaGène. They were ordered using the lkh 1 -1 function in CarthaGène for each group.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%