2018
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2017.2716407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined Local and Centralized Voltage Control in Active Distribution Networks

Abstract: Abstract-A two-level real-time voltage control scheme is proposed to keep voltages within specified limits in distribution grids using Distributed Generation Units (DGUs). It combines a local and a centralized control of their reactive powers. The local control provides fast response after a disturbance, reducing its impact and enhancing voltage quality. The centralized control uses measurements collected throughout the network to bring the voltages inside tighter limits and balance the various DGU contributio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 146 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(46 reference statements)
0
48
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In [20], a two-level voltage control by electrical springs is proposed, which contains both optimized dispatch and distributed operation. In [21], a voltage regulation scheme combined local and centralized control is proposed. In [22], the decentralized and distributed voltage control scheme is proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [20], a two-level voltage control by electrical springs is proposed, which contains both optimized dispatch and distributed operation. In [21], a voltage regulation scheme combined local and centralized control is proposed. In [22], the decentralized and distributed voltage control scheme is proposed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the size of sensitivity matrix l is N x T and can be analytically calculated following the analysis presented in [23]. Additionally, the size of sensitivity matrix s is N x N x T and is calculated for each time instant t by inverting the power flow Jacobian matrix [8]. Afterward, the linearized bi-objective OVR problem is solved multiple times for different combinations of the weight coefficients.…”
Section: First Stagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An additional operation constraint is introduced in [7] to limit the daily number of the tap changes. Furthermore, an offline coordination of the Q(V ) droop characteristics is proposed in [8] to minimize the overall reactive power of the DG units. Nevertheless, the above-mentioned methods attempt to solve a single-objective optimization problem, focusing on the coordinated operation of the DG units and neglecting possible interactions with other network devices, such as the OLTC [9].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The impact of the model predictive control of the ADN voltages to the transmission grid is discussed in [17]. A two-level real-time voltage correction scheme is proposed in [18]. The local level provides the fast response to a disturbance, and the central level coordinates the various distributed generation units relying on the concept of MPC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length of the prediction horizon should be equal to the length of the control horizon unless the controller is requested to consider changes happening beyond the control horizon [16]. References [3,4,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]18,19] apply constant horizon parameters, but how those parameters are determined is not discussed. The horizon parameters in [5] is chosen to be the time in which the predicted voltage drops by a predefined percentage at the initial control instant, and the horizon parameters are kept constant during the entire receding-horizon optimization process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%