1990
DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1990.tb00769.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Combined monetary unit sampling from several independent populations: Sample size planning and sample evaluation with the moment method*

Abstract: Abstract, Although auditors often determine an upper bound on the amount of error in individual accounts, their primary concem is with the overall amount of error over several accounts. This paper presents a combined bound procedure for determining such an overall upper bound when using the moment method of monetary unit sampling (MUS). A procedure is also presented for determining optimal sample sizes over several independent accounts. The new combined bound procedure provides the moment method of MUS with th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be applied in auditing different accounts of financial statements, e.g., accounts receivable, inventories etc. (Grimlund, 1990;Johnson and Mohsen, 2013). By applying the method of monetary unit sampling, sample size can be calculated according with the formula presented below:…”
Section: The Advantages and Limitations Of The Monetary Unit Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be applied in auditing different accounts of financial statements, e.g., accounts receivable, inventories etc. (Grimlund, 1990;Johnson and Mohsen, 2013). By applying the method of monetary unit sampling, sample size can be calculated according with the formula presented below:…”
Section: The Advantages and Limitations Of The Monetary Unit Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%