Combined Multi-scale Analyses on Strain/Damage/Microstructure in Steel: Example of Damage Evolution Associated with <i>ε</i>-martensitic Transformation

Abstract

We studied damage evolution behavior associated with ε-martensite in a Fe-28Mn alloy. Visible factors of damage evolution associated with ε-martensite are considered to be strain distribution, microstructure, micro-void and crack. Combinatorial use of replica digital image correlation, electron backscattering diffraction, and electron channeling contrast imaging enables to clarify the distributions of strain, microstructure and damage. Through quantitative damage analysis, damage evolution behavior was classified into three regimes: (i) incubation regime, (ii) nucleation regime, and (iii) growth regime. In the incubation regime, an interaction of ε/ε-martensite plates and impingement of ε-martensite plates on grain boundaries caused plastic strain localization owing to plastic accommodation. In the nucleation regime, accumulation of the plastic strain on the boundaries caused microvoid formation. The damage propagated along with the boundaries through coalescence with other micro-voids, but the propagation was arrested by crack blunting at non-transformed austenite. In the growth regime, the arrested damage grew again when a further plastic strain was provided sufficiently to initiate ε-martensite near the damage.KEY WORDS: high Mn austenitic steel; ε-martensite; damage; replica method; digital image correlation; electron back scatter diffraction; electron channeling contrast imaging.

Quantitative Evaluation of Hydrogen Effects on Evolutions of Deformation-Induced ε-Martensite and Damage in a High-Mn Steel

“…[1,2] In steels, two types of martensitic transformation have been representatively recognized: transformations from face-centered cubic (c) to body-centered cubic/tetragonal (a¢) structures and to hexagonal close-packed (e) structures. Both types of martensitic transformation result in the TRIP effect, [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10] but c-e martensitic transformation can cause microstructural damage evolution (here, the damage means voids and cracks in the microstructure scale), [11] and associated premature fracture, [12] depending on the alloying element, microstructure, and deformation conditions such as temperature. Therefore, the use of c-e martensitic transformation requires appropriate alloy/microstructure designs to control resistance to damage evolution.…”

Development of a Method for Evaluating Microstructurally Small Fatigue Crack Initiation and Growth by Using an Automatic System for <i>In Situ</i> Observation in Conjunction with a Digital-Image Correlation Technique

“…Moreover, the digital-image correlation (DIC) technique appears to be effective in capturing details of microscopic deformations. [16][17][18][19][20][21] We therefore developed and built an automatic system for in situ observation to monitor the initiation and growth of small fatigue cracks. In this system, a digital microscope equipped with an automatic focusing system captures a series of panoramic images during the fatigue test.…”

Availability of Opal Photonic Crystal Films for Visualizing Heterogeneous Strain Evolution in Steels: Example of Lüders Deformation

“…In particular, plastic strain-microstructure relation is key to control strengthductility balance. 1) The microstructural strain evolution in steels is significantly heterogeneous, [2][3][4] and hierarchical from nm to mm scales. 5,6) Therefore, various strain visualization techniques with different spatial resolutions and ranges of view field, e.g.…”